Tag Archives: Koleman Strumpf
Here’s the man who would deliver a wise analysis on whether the InTrade HCR PM is being manipulated or traded by “DC insiders”.
Previously: Insider trading in the InTrade prediction market on health care reform?
Koleman Strumpf on how weaker copyright protection benefits society
Koleman Strumpf on how weaker copyright protection benefits society
Is Koleman Strumpf a provocator?
Joke.
One week later, the debate is still raging under his post.
New comments from David Pennock and Jason Ruspini.
I like when people argue with each other. It generates pageviews. Commenters frenetically download that webpage to see whether their opponents have added something.
Answering Koleman Strumpf’s riddle
-
The structure of InTrade’s commissions …?…
The design of InTrade’s multi-outcome markets …?…
A documentary film is going to be made about the book “Freakonomics”. The problem is that the film won’t be made by one able and focused director —but rather by a bunch of folks, whose implication in the whole project will be ultra minimal. The expected result of that idiocy is that their documentary will be an uninteresting mosaic of short and superficial takes, and will surely tank at the box office, like all the Paris Hilton movies did. The Hollywood Stock Exchange traders are no idiots: they are sensing that that Freakonomics project is a stinking lemon, and they are selling the event derivative like it is bubonic plague.
-
The “esteemed” economists are lining up, trying to second-guess the HSX traders, jotting down their favorite hypothesis about the possible reason for the upcoming disaster —but all smart that they are, they can’t see the obvious:
THE FREAKONOMICS DOCUMENTARY PROJECT IS A STINKING LEMON BECAUSE NO ONE OF VALUE IS IN CHARGE OF IT —FROM A [...]
Steve Levitt and Koleman Strumpf in the news
Via our good friend Caveat Bettor.
It’s a complicated affair. I can’t sum it up for you. Go scanning it, if you’re curious.
-
Best wishes to Steve Levitt and Koleman Strumpf.
-
Recent Comments