CERN scientists are gagged from discussing the close correlation between cosmic ray penetration and temperature. — [CHART + VIDEO]

The quantity of cosmic rays has an influence on climate, but this isn’t factored into the IPCC’s consensus science. http://medwarts.com/flat-warts-symptoms-causes-and-ways-of-treatment/ Continue reading

All 3 British political leaders fell for the global warming scam.

No Gravatar

Solar activity and cosmic rays drive the Earth’s climate.

Global warming due to human-produced CO2 is the biggest scientific imposture of all times.

These 3 political leaders are all wrong.

Solar activity and cosmic rays drive the Earths climate.

No Gravatar

Global warming due to human-produced CO2 is the biggest scientific imposture of all times.

Henrik Svensmark &#8211- The Cloud Mystery (French version):

Richard Lindzen:

Vincent Courtillot (in French, alas):

The Climate Gate scandal highlights the modus operandi of the academic mafia.

No Gravatar

Required reading this Friday:

How to Manufacture a Climate Consensus &#8211- About expelling the non-believers from the academic journals publishing on climate science

The Dog Ate Global Warming &#8211- About the destruction of raw temperature data of Planet Earth

More info on climate change.

P.S.: East Anglia e-mails (CRU)

Climate Stats = Sausage Making

No Gravatar

How to Make Your Own Hockey Stick &#8211- Required reading for our good friend Caveat Bettor.

More info on &#8220-climategate&#8221- at Memeorandum

&#8220-Hide the decline&#8221-

&#8220-Hide the decline&#8221-

Every time the global temperature data gets revised and homogenized, the trends keep increasing.

No Gravatar

One scientist investigated data from one source:

What this does show is that there is at least one temperature station where the trend has been artificially increased to give a false warming where the raw data shows cooling. In addition, the average raw data for Northern Australia is quite different from the adjusted, so there must be a number of … mmm … let me say “interesting” adjustments in Northern Australia other than just Darwin.

And with the Latin saying “Falsus in unum, falsus in omis” (false in one, false in all) as our guide, until all of the station “adjustments” are examined, adjustments of CRU, GHCN, and GISS alike, we can’t trust anyone using homogenized numbers.

More at Memeorandum

Betting on Copenhagen

Emile Servan-Schreiber comments on a New York Times opinion piece:

The idea that betting could help us gain clarity on some controversial scientific questions has first been proposed by George Mason economics professor Robin Hanson in 1992 in a paper entitled &#8220-Could Gambling Save Science&#8221- and available online here: http://hanson.gmu.edu/gamble.html

The benefits of creating prediction markets about controversial climate-change issues in particular is further developed on Nate Silver&#8217-s blog and in this presentation given at CalTech in 2004: http://us.newsfutures.com/home/environmentalFutures.html