One un-hired job candidate and one HammerSmith employee tell all about BetFair Malta’s combo market maker (trading algorithm + human market makers) operating on the multiples.

Chris F. Masse March 18th, 2008

No Gravatar

Graham “Sharp” Minds, in a comment on Midas Oracle:

I am one of the people who Ed Murray has referred to in this blog. I was interviewed at Hammersmith by Betfair during the summer. For the time being I am going to concentrate on what Betfair has finally admitted from the past, present and future plans that betfair outlined to me.

Loki Lab Rat 18 Mar 08:20 I can answer this one quickly. There is a trading team based in Malta which manages the risk around the multiples product. They have software which tells them what the risk is associated with a potential result is and suggests what hedge bets can be placed to mitigate that risk at current exchange prices. They then place the hedge bets to manage the risk. They place the bets using the same software as everyone else using the site and respecting any in-play delays.

There is 3 objectives for the “Maltese” trading team, “Maltese” is in quotation marks because betfair were unclear to me about who and what parts of the trading team were still going to be based in London and those who were going to be in Malta.


i) Hedging
ii) Trading
iii) Arbing

All 3 amount to the same thing, Betfair playing their own markets.

On each of the 3 points

i) Hedging, this is what Betfair has admitted to and has been doing to from day 1 of the multiples. Betfair admit to taking the other side of the bet for the mutiples, so I guess like any other bookmaker it is only natural they “hedge” their bets to reduce potential liabilites.

However unlike traditional bookmakers, who will lay off a multiple when one runs up, the bets taken by Betfair multiples are placed directly back into the exchanges before they “run-up”.

This is one of the reasons behind the mutliple groups, they look at the back/lays placed on the mutiples for the first match and then the bets are placed into the exchange to reduce the liabilites and to cream off the difference between the price they have offered and that offered on the exchanges.

ii) Trading, this is what betfair are attempting at the moment, albeit unsuccessfully from what I last heard. Betfair have admitted they change their hedging positions, this by definition is trading. however the most serious aspect of their trading, is the in-running trading.

If betfair have accepted liabilities X & Y for events A and B being the outcome of a match, then why would liability X for A or Y for B be no longer acceptable during a match unless there was an advantage to be gained by trading betfair’s position in-running?

Afterall, on betfair’s exchange with a 100% book, whether that 100% book was an efficient or inefficient, the net expectation of betfairs position would remain the same if they were trading hedging positions blindly to “balance” the liabilities.

In the instance of an inefficient market, if betfair were blindly trading (i.e. not using odds compilers, traders or other means to form an opinion on the market) in-running then there would be no net gain as betfair would be equally likely to be on the efficient and inefficient prices and the differences would average out.

iii) Arbing, this is betfairs ultimate goal for the multiples. If this new cross-matching bot is being called a superbot, then this will be the hyperbot. A bot which will perfectly arb the mutiple bets into the exchange so betfair can make money from it’s mutiples operation risk free.

But if betfair are denying that they never form an opinion to a market and place bets accordingly and they have no plans to do this in the future either. Then why are they covertly recruiting academics from universities, odds compilers from the bookmakers and recognised traders from their own customer base?

If betfair are playing their own markets, then what is to stop them abusing the position they have by owning the exchange. Having worked for several bookmakers in the past, I have yet to know one who would voluntarily wait 5 secs to place their “hedges”, wait in the queue like everyone else, make trading decisions according to the flow of money or not use their “warm sources” wisely.

-

Via Dave, Loki Lab Rat:

I can answer this one quickly. There is a trading team based in Malta which manages the risk around the multiples product. They have software which tells them what the risk is associated with a potential result is and suggests what hedge bets can be placed to mitigate that risk at current exchange prices. They then place the hedge bets to manage the risk. They place the bets using the same software as everyone else using the site and respecting any in-play delays. The line about ‘opportunities in-play’ refers to the match situation and is nothing to do with beating the delay.

For example, when just about every favourite won their international Euro 2008 qualifiers in early June last year (known as ‘Black Wednesday’ in some quarters), Moldova scored late-ish against Greece to square the match. The multiples team heavily laid the draw as the match drew to a close as it was a much better potential result than a Greek win. That meant that when Greece did score with the last kick of the game, our losses were mitigated to some extent by the hedge bets placed in-running.

The multiples product is run under Betfair’s Maltese bookmaking license and is regulated by the LGA there. Therefore the team has to be based in Malta. The operation is an arms-length operation - there is no special access to any functionality or data from the exchange.

-

Loki Lab Rat:

frog2, It is best I leave questions on cross matching for the Q & A. I am not really that close to the project. I just thought I would answer the one on the multiples team to prevent any speculation getting out of hand.

-

Rab Bibater in a comment on Midas Oracle:

It is also pertinent that this team operates under Maltese jurisdiction; which of course puts it outside the scrutiny of the UK’s Gambling Commission!

However, I think there is also another issue that needs to be explored, and that is the general efficacy of a policy that allows Betfair’s own employees to trade on their exchange. Many people within Betfair have access to historical trading data unavailable to the broader betting public; such as what stables are backed and when; the significance of early money for particular horses etc; some are also able to access the betting records of individual persons. I specifically remember a comment made on Betfair radio concerning the boys in the office and how they had mopped up all the value regarding a particular horse from a gambling yard. The problem for Betfair, and one that is not likely to go away, is that nobody is sure any longer as to who it is they are actually trading against.

10 Responses to “One un-hired job candidate and one HammerSmith employee tell all about BetFair Malta’s combo market maker (trading algorithm + human market makers) operating on the multiples.”

  1. [...] has just written a comment bringing in some intriguing (but yet unconfirmed) facts [UPDATE: FOLLOW THIS LINK FOR MORE INFORMATION]: Just one point, Betfair have already hired a team of traders to bet into its own markets last [...]

  2. Rab BibaterNo Gravataron 19 Mar 2008 at 5:44 am

    Betfair parades itself as being a revolutionary company.  A revolutionary company, however, cannot aford to have skeletons in its cupboards.  Nor can it afford to be seen as a company that exploits a weak regulator and pulls the wool over a betting public, whose only source of information is a bunch of self-interested, self-promoting fools on the UK’s racing channels and Channel 4.

    Betfair needs to nip the current round of noise in the bud once and for all.  It needs to clarify its own advertisements, in which it states that "Because you are betting against other punters, "you could" get better value;" which in the light of alleged revelations that its trades in its own markets, would seem to amount to a misrepresentation.

    Regardless of what Betfair is and is not doing, its various schemes are primarily designed to increase the company’s revenue.  All well and good, but as revenue increases, so transaction costs should be coming down; or is the extra revenue being employed to hold up some more shaky parts of the empire …such as poker, gaming and Timeform?

    The head in the sand approach, which has worked so well in the past, may just be about to unravel.

    P>S..One has to wonder about the incompetency of those that run Betdaq; who, when presented with an opportunity to steal market share from Betfair, do sweet FA……..not wanting to upset the Bet Chronicle apple cart perhaps…

  3. [...] Rab Bibater’s comment on Midas Oracle: […] BetFair needs to nip the current round of noise in the bud once and for all. It needs to clarify its own advertisements, in which it states that “Because you are betting against other punters, ‘you could’ get better value;” which in the light of alleged revelations that its trades in its own markets, would seem to amount to a misrepresentation. […] [...]

  4. [...] didn’t clear up the issue of how and when BetFair operates on its own markets, though. Read the previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:Proponents say the creativity and anonymous [...]

  5. Graham "Sharp" MindsNo Gravataron 19 Mar 2008 at 12:46 pm

    loki Lab Rat-Betfair Employee

    "They have software which tells them what the risk is associated with a potential result is and suggests what hedge bets can be placed to mitigate that risk at current exchange prices. They then place the hedge bets to manage the risk."

    Once the alogorithm for this software is perfected it will no longer "suggest" potenential "hedge bets" but will actually place them as a fully functional bot on the betfair exchange.

    Graham "sharp" Minds-Interveiwed by betfair

    "If this new cross-matching bot is being called a superbot, then this will be the hyperbot. A bot which will perfectly arb the mutiple bets into the exchange so betfair can make money from it’s mutiples operation risk free"

    The perfection of the algorithym was one of the things betfair asked me in my interview if I could help solve.

  6. [...] One un-hired job candidate and one HammerSmith employee tell all about BetFair Malta’s combo marke… Read the previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:Dick Cheney, the new Churchill?BetFair Malta’s [...]

  7. [...] One un-hired job candidate and one HammerSmith employee tell all about BetFair Malta’s combo marke… Read the previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:MIDAS ORACLE POWER: People googling about BetFair’s [...]

  8. [...] One un-hired job candidate and one HammerSmith employee tell all about BetFair Malta’s combo marke… Read the previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:MIDAS ORACLE POWER: People googling about BetFair’s [...]

  9. [...] the rumor that BetFair UK (in HammerSmith, London) have been hiring what was described as a team of human market makers, whose task would be to operate on the BetFair betting exchange. That rumor has lead some to think [...]

  10. [...] One un-hired job candidate told everyone who would listen that BetFair was preparing to do some hidden market-making on their betting exchange —hiring a &#82…. [...]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.