![]()
Chris Masse will admit to being behind chrismasse.com and/or overcomingmidas.com
–
![]()
Niall O’-Connor:
Cowardly bastards …if this can be confirmed I will pass the story on to one of my contacts at the Guardian. And I will ensure that the other cowards who received emails last Friday about the websites, but chose to keep quiet are also exposed- by informing their companies of this obscene example of corporate bullying.
![]()
IMPORTANT UPDATE REGARDING THE INCIDENT.
Somebody did set up a website making a fool of me. Searching who is behind this turned out the IP address of the NewsFutures server —-but Emile Servan-Schreiber is as innocent as a lamb because this data was in fact fudged by the attacker (so as to wrongly put the blame on NewsFutures). It might well be the same thing for the IP that connected to comment here.
–
UPDATE:
Did the attacker try to pin it on, not just one, but *two* prediction market software vendors?
http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/13/did-the-attacker-try-to-pin-it-on-not-just-one-but-two-prediction-market-software-vendors/
–

–

–

–

–

–

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
![]()
I made a typo in the title of each of my 2 previous blog posts about polls versus prediction markets. (The content of those blog posts featured the correct spelling, fortunately.)
My apology.
And thanks to the “-research scientist”- who spotted the typo.
![]()
If yes, you could help by linking to our post:
– The truth about prediction markets
Thanks. Appreciated. I will make up to you.
These bloggers have already linked to it:
– Professor Mike Giberson-
– Professor Andrew Gelman-
– Barry Ritholtz (the #1 Wall Street blogger)-
– JusTrade Blog-
– BetFair Predicts-
– Betting @ BetFair.
![]()
Google Analytics of Midas Oracle .ORG:

–
On the other hand, our competitor, the New York Times (which web-hosts Freakonomics), is in bad shape:

![]()
Come to the wonderful world of collective intelligence, wisdom of crowds, and prediction markets!…- The sun shines bright, the market-generated predictions are vastly superior to the polls as election predictors, and the track record of the public prediction markets stretches as far as the eye can see. There are opportunities aplenty in the field of prediction markets, and the trading technology is cheap. Every working enterprise can have its own internal prediction exchange, and inside every exchange, a set of enterprise prediction markets that correctly predicts the future of business, which their happy, all-American CEO listens to. Life is good in the magic world of prediction markets…- it’-s paradise on Earth.
Ha! ha! ha! ha!…- That’-s what they tell you, anyway…- —-because they are selling an image (just as Bernie Madoff did). They are selling it thru their vendor websites, vendor conferences, vendor-inspired articles in blogs, newspapers and magazines, and interviews of vendor data-fed professors in the media.
The prediction market technology is not a disruptive technology, and the social utility of the prediction markets is marginal. Number one, the aggregated information has value only for the totally uninformed people (a group that comprises those who overly obsess with prediction markets and have a narrow cultural universe). Number two, the added accuracy (if any) is minute, and, anyway, doesn’-t fill up the gap between expectations and omniscience (which is how people judge forecasters). In our view, the social utility of the prediction markets lays in efficiency, not in accuracy. In complicated situations, the prediction markets integrate expectations (informed by facts and expertise) much faster than the mass media do. Their accuracy/efficiency is their uniqueness. It is their velocity that we should put to work.
–
Here’-s now our definition of prediction markets:
–
A prediction market is a market for a contract that yields payments based on the outcome of a partially uncertain future event, such as an election. A contract pays $100 only if candidate X wins the election, and $0 otherwise. When the market price of an X contract is $60, the prediction market believes that candidate X has a 60% chance of winning the election. The price of this event derivative represents the imputed perceived likelihood of the partially uncertain future outcome (i.e., its aggregated expected probability). A 60% probability means that, in a series of events each with a 60% probability, the favored outcome is expected to occur 60 times out of 100, and the unfavored outcome is expected to occur 40 times out of 100.
Each prediction exchange organizes its own set of real-money and/or play-money markets, using either a CDA or a MSR mechanism —-with or without an automated market maker.
Prediction markets enable us to attain collective intelligence. Prediction markets produce dynamic, objective probabilistic predictions on the outcomes of future events by aggregating disparate pieces of information that the traders bring when they agree on prices. The event derivative traders are informed by the primary indicators (i.e., the primary sources of information), like the polls, for instance. These informed speculators then execute their transactions based on their anticipations about the future —-anticipations that will be either confirmed or infirmed.
The value of a set of prediction markets consists in the added accuracy that these prediction markets provide relative to the other meta predictive mechanisms, times the value of accuracy in improved decisions, minus the cost of maintaining these prediction markets, relative to the cost of the other meta predictive mechanisms. A highly accurate set of prediction markets has little value if some other meta predictive mechanism(s) can provide similar accuracy at a lower cost, or if very few substantial decisions are influenced by accurate predictions on its topic.
–
PS: I am updating a bit the content of this webpage, over time —-so as to finesse the message.
![]()

–
BetFair – Live Chat Session – Tuesday, January 27th, 2009
–
![]()
I am (finally) finished writing up the mission statement of The Open Institute Of Prediction Markets.
I have asked Mike Giberson, Mike Linksvayer, and (of course) David Pennock, to give me feedback, so I can see whether I am on the right track or not. If it’-s the case, and once I have integrated their feedback, I will show it to 3 other prediction market luminaries, and so forth, until an ethereal sense of perfection emerges out of it. (Could take weeks.)
Stay tuned.
PS: Google is forbidden to snatch that “-mission”- webpage, don’-t ever think of trying to read the cached webpage.
UPDATE: Got feedback. Need to work on it.
–
![]()

–
A short post to thank all the people who e-mailed me to assure me of their support for this long-term endeavor.
There are so many luminaries and organizations who have said they were “-interested”- by this institute project that I am starting to think that this idea just can’-t fall apart —-the expectations are now too high, and our duty to the next generations is to succeed.
That said, I don’-t have yet the first cent for this institute, and 2009 will undergo the worst economic recession in our lifetime —-but who cares about the harsh reality, as long as we have sweet dreams. ![]()
–
