Betcha.com: On Steamroller Justice and Reports of our Demise

No Gravatar

Yesterday, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer ran a story entitled &#8220-Betting web site&#8217-s computers seized.&#8221- Within hours, bloggers and other news outlets picked up the story and translated it into something akin to &#8220-Betcha shut down.&#8221-

Problem: the translation isn&#8217-t true. (WARNING: if tails of government bureaucrats running roughshod over its citizens turns your stomach, stop reading here.)

What&#8217-s Happening
What happened was this. Last Friday, Betcha&#8217-s attorneys and I met with the state Gambling Commission to address their concerns. They had us drive to their offices in Lacey, WA, about an hour from Betcha&#8217-s offices. The meeting lasted all of about five minutes, with it ending in a deputy commissioner handing us a pre-printed Cease and Desist order. I&#8217-ll attached a PDF copy of it later, but the gist of it was &#8220-shut down or else.&#8221- Why she couldn&#8217-t have told us this over the phone I am not sure &#8212- I suspect it had something to do with making my Friday afternoon a very expensive one. (Tax dollars hard at work.) At almost the exact same moment, Seattle lawyer Lee Rousso was, coincidentally, filing a lawsuit in state court asking the court to declare the state&#8217-s anti-Internet gambling ban unconstitutional. Although the law has previously been criticized on First Amendment grounds [1|2], and the Commission has taken positions in the past that appear pretty tough to square with any notion of free speech (an example), Mr. Rousso&#8217-s challenge is based on the Commerce Clause &#8212- that is, the law seeks to protect the in-state Native American casinos from out-of-state competition, and is therefore unconstitutional.

On Monday, I arrived to the offices early to unlock the doors so the raiders wouldn&#8217-t bust them down. (Not cheap to replace a busted down door.) A few hours later, Commission enforcers, indeed, showed up and took everything. Our books, our posters, my business cards &#8212- everything. (The warrant wasn&#8217-t limited – among other things, it included &#8220-stamps,&#8221- &#8220-printers,&#8221- &#8220-scanners,&#8221- &#8220-jewelry,&#8221- &#8220-envelopes&#8221-, &#8220-napkins&#8221-, &#8220-cardboard coasters&#8221- and &#8220-keys.&#8221-) No one from Betcha was there &#8212- not a good way to start the week, being on the business end of a roving commission. Ironically, my wife stopped by during the raid and chatted up Rick Herrington, the chief Raider (read: head of Commission enforcement.) When my wife asked Mr. Herrington whether they&#8217-d be selling our equipment on eBay, he shrugged his shoulders, as if to say &#8220-maybe yes, maybe no.&#8221- He then told her &#8220-Nick should have come to us first about this.&#8221- This exchange I find revealing: it seems that the Commission is more interested in ruining me and Betcha than anything else. Why? Because we&#8217-re near their turf.

As troubling was how the conversation continued. According to my wife, Mr. Herrington repeated several times &#8220-he&#8217-s breaking the law, he&#8217-s breaking the law.&#8221- When she told him that that was a judge&#8217-s decision, he replied &#8220-doesn&#8217-t matter, he&#8217-s still breaking the law.&#8221- (If that&#8217-s not guilty until proven innocent, I don&#8217-t know what is.)

On Tuesday, we petitioned a state court in Olympia to enjoin the Commission from this &#8220-seize and threaten now, ask questions later&#8221- approach. It almost never happens that a court will enjoin law enforcement from enforcing its version of the law, no matter how warped that version may be. This is an extraordinary remedy and we didn&#8217-t get it yesterday, although it wasn&#8217-t for lack of fantastic work by our lawyer.

The hearing wasn&#8217-t without substantial incident and irony. Apparently, although several people at both the Commission and Attorney General&#8217-s office had been served with our papers via fax, e-mail, and PDF, someone at the Commission did not receive an original copy of one of the documents, as required by the state service statute. As a result, we could not proceed until we could prove someone at the Commission had been served with an original copy of this document. We then had to race across Olympia to the Commission&#8217-s office in a nearby town to serve the one of the Commissioners himself &#8212- personally. (Not a single person in the legal department was working on that glorious 94-degree Tuesday &#8212- go figure.) The irony &#8212- exactitude matters big time to the Commission when it comes to serving paperwork that they already had. But precision in reading a criminal statute that may result in me doing years in the Gray Bar Hotel, not to mention wiping out a fair bit of investor capital and no less than seven years of man work &#8212- nah.

What&#8217-s Next
In terms of next steps, the situation is this. We are pursuing an action to get a court to declare Betcha legal. If the law and/or the Constitution matters in Washington (open question, that), I am confident Betcha will prevail. In the meantime, however, we face a Cease and Desist Order from a Commission that appears hell-bent on destroying Betcha at all costs. We&#8217-re going to review it in detail later today and decide on a course of action. We may have to take the betting-for-money part of the site down until we get on the other side of the steamroller.

You can rest assured, however, about our resolve. The government bureaucracy has been running roughshod over the citizens of this country for far too long. (Check out this book or BoilingFrog.com, among other sites, for some examples.) Prosecutors make up facts, legislators make it a crime to play poker in your own home, bureaucrats rewrite the laws, logic and the dictionary &#8212- and we&#8217-re all left at their mercy. The frog is boiling and the water&#8217-s getting hotter every day. I pledge to the friends and users of Betcha.com that I will do my part to turn the heat down. If that means rotting in jail, so be it.

Cross-posted from the Betcha.com blog

What should be Done about Manipulation of Prediction Markets?

No Gravatar

In “Is Manipulation Good for a Prediction Market,” Eric Zitzewitz seeks to counter my view that “Deep Pocketed Manipulators are a Prediction Market’s Friend” by suggesting that even if my argument is correct, manipulators still may be a net bad for prediction markets.

I argued that a manipulator ends up subsidizing the participation of informed traders in the market by putting money on uneconomic positions. Eric responded with three reasons that manipulation nonetheless may tend to undermine prediction markets. In brief (and in my words), he said:

  1. People have a distaste for behaviors which violate the spirit of the activity.
  2. The possibility of manipulation, and therefore a biased indicator, will lead decision makers to rely on less efficient methods for information gathering.
  3. Manipulation makes it harder to understand what is happening in the market – manipulation is harder to decode than noise – because the manipulator actively tries to trick the market.

I suspect Eric is right that many people will instinctively oppose manipulation– even when a manipulator&#8217-s actions comply with the explicit rules of the market, the conduct seems to violate the spirit of the enterprise. The manipulators aren&#8217-t betting that they can out predict you, they don&#8217-t care about out-predicting you, they are just using the market in the attempt to buy a signal for which they have a private value. This violation of the spirit of the enterprise probably strikes most people as just wrong.

I think the best response to instinctive opposition to manipulators is &#8220-get over it&#8221-. Hold your nose if you have to, but take as much of the manipulator’s money as you can. (If it troubles you to take advantage of manipulators this way, consider the public good you are doing by imposing a tax on undesirable behavior.)

Another obvious and useful response is to become more skilled at reading market prices, so as to not be readily fooled. In the face of a dramatic price change, consult other exchanges or the prices in related markets in order to gain context. Deploying such sophistication increases the cost and diminishes the usefulness of price manipulation.

The second and third points Eric makes suggests that the possibility of manipulation will reduce the value of prediction markets and lead decision makers to rely on noisier, but less manipulable tools for information gathering. (E.g., use expert forecasts instead of manipulable prediction markets.) In these cases, manipulation leads to real economic losses.

Useful responses here constitute a research program for the academics and market developers: what effects do various rules have on the potential for manipulation? what effects do the rules have on market efficiency? can manipulation be detected by analysis of trading patterns (perhaps something a prediction market could implement itself), or would more extensive investigations be necessary (likely beyond the capacity of a prediction market)?

Prediction markets, when they work well, create something of value: a price that can serve as a useful probability forecast of future events or conditions. If anyone relies on these prices to make decisions of economic significance, that reliance will create incentives for third parties to influence the prices. On these grounds I think the potential for manipulation is inherent in the enterprise.

So what? To some extent the natural balancing effects of the market will tend to counter manipulation, because manipulation provides a subsidy to participation by informed traders, and informed trading counters manipulation. This process is unlikely to be transparent, however, given that manipulation only works if it is disguised. The best response to the residual prospect of manipulation seems to be to resort to informed-rather-than-naive interpretation of prediction market prices, and research into market rules which may enhance usefulness of prediction markets.

Volumes on InTrade are way up from 2004.

No Gravatar

Just thought this might interest some of you:

  • Total volume in 2004 Democratic nomination markets: $5.2 million (data is taken from a talk I gave in San Diego)
  • Volume in 2008 Dem and GOP nomination markets (with 7 months to go before the primaries start): $24 million

Update:

  • CFM asks below whether the higher cumulative volumes on the 2008 contracts just reflect lots of trading in 2005 and early 2006.  I didn&#8217-t have an answer at the time, but if one recalculates the cumulative volume in the nomination markets as of today (10/24/07), it is $30.2 million, up about $6 million from early July.
  • So more volume in the last 3.5 months than in the entire history of the 2004 markets.  Of course, there are two nomination fights this time around, but there are also still months to go before the primaries.
  • This, together with the fact that there are many more political markets on Intrade competing for liquidity, suggests that InTrade&#8217-s politics markets are alive and well.

Shifting from stocks to futures

No Gravatar

This article was originally written for the simExchange community to inform them that there will be no weekly IPOs for new game stocks this week.

There will be no stock IPOs on the simExchange for the week of July 9. Part of the reason is to shift trading activity to the futures contracts. As you may have noticed, the simExchange has been emphasizing the futures contracts lately with redesigns to the site.

The reason we have been putting more attention on the futures contracts is that after collaborating with the NPD Group, people in the video game industry, and those who cover it on Wall Street, we have learned that short-term unit sales data is much more relevant to the video game industry. Lifetime global sales are hard to judge and not as informative to the industry because it does not detail when the sales will occur (within a publisher&#8217-s fiscal quarter) and at what price the games will be sold (to forecast revenue). The NPD Group has been very kind to provide us unit sales data to settle our futures contracts to make short-term forecasts possible for the US market.

In the future, we will be using stocks to better judge which games we want to list as futures each month to concentrate trading and provide more accurate forecasts.

This article is cross posted from No IPOs for the week of July 9 on The simExchange Official Blog.

Insider Trading + Prediction Markets

No Gravatar

InTrade&#8217-s John Delaney interviewed by Freakonomics:

Q. How does Intrade deal with insider trading?

A. Insider trading is one of the wicked problems, perhaps. Intrade is about providing the best predictive information. If insiders have information, then getting that information reflected in the market increases the quality of the information. I know this is not the conventional view concerning insider trading, and I am not arguing wholesale adoption or acceptance of insider trading. But we all know that, in the real world, insiders trade on inside information. We have even had markets on insider trading. Our view is to get the best information available into the market while we make sure there is some fair protection for outsiders.

I will have a third blog post on this John Delaney interview, later on, where I will make some comments.

Intrade: Obama and Clinton at near-parity

No Gravatar

Full disclosure: I trade real money in all markets mentioned.

Both preceding and after the utterly uninformed pronouncements from the past week or so that Hillary was &#8220-the one to beat,&#8221- that she was &#8220-in a league with Tiger Woods and Roger Federer: no. 1,&#8221- the futures markets have voiced a somewhat different opinion.

Hillary, past 120 days:

hrc_jul6.png

Obama, July 6:

obama_jul6.png

There was an unfortunate misperception that Hillary became an overwhelmingly dominant frontrunner on the betting markets, exemplified by the two articles to which I linked. The only time interval in which that was even arguably true was during Obama&#8217-s dip in early June.

Anyway, basically, Obama&#8217-s second-quarter fundraising prowess constitutes the second time in a row in which he&#8217-s demolished the Clintons at their own game. (The meaning of Q1 numbers is much less clear, because lots of politicians, such as John Edwards in 2003 and Mitt Romney in 2007, wrung their personal networks for as much as they possibly could in the first quarter. The second quarter calls for more breadth and depth in one&#8217-s donor base.)

Poll numbers do not mean too much at this point- Joe Lieberman was still winning the Democratic primary at this point in 2003, although nobody took him very seriously. Hillary Clinton has Lieberman-esque name recognition, but her campaign suffers from a yawning enthusiasm gap and a weaker, more reluctant donor network.

From this point on, Obama can expect to be taken at least a little more seriously by the decaying, but still all too relevant MSM. More positive coverage will translate into better poll numbers, which will further undermine Hillary&#8217-s campaign.

With Gore having issued something akin to a &#8220-Sherman statement&#8221- yesterday, and Edwards utterly unable to move the debate beyond the price tag of his last haircut and his own work for the Fortress hedge fund, the Democratic primary is coalescing into a Hillary-Obama slugfest.

The 2014 Winter Games goes to… a Russian Black Sea resort, Sochi.

No Gravatar

The Times of London

The prediction markets were not accurate. The readers of Midas Oracle won&#8217-t be surprised by this total debacle, as I did publish a blog post in April 2007 lambasting the incompetents who entertained the idea that betting markets could be predictive on this one. They can&#8217-t.

The bizarre twist in this story is that our George Tziralis was over there, in Guatemala City, attending that damn 119th IOC session. Guess what&#8230- George Tziralis had put his faith on&#8230- Sochi. Congrats, man. First time I see a prediction market expert beating the betting markets. George, you&#8217-re great.

InTrade-TradeSports:

Sochi

Pyeongchang

Salzburg

Harry Potter actor Dan Radcliffe nude on Midas Oracle

No Gravatar

Equus

Next: Harry Potter actor Dan Radcliffe nude on Midas Oracle&#8230- AGAIN

Previous: Deep Throat sells Harry Potter short. + The contract of the Harry Potter event derivative at NewsFutures may be flawed. + The Harry Potter litmus test

Previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:

  • The FaceBook profiles of the 2 most important men of the field of prediction markets
  • THE HUMAN GADFLY WHOSE OBJECTIONS ROBIN HANSON IS DUCKING…???…
  • Google now considers Midas Oracle as a major blog.
  • Horizon 2015: A long-term strategic perspective for the real-money prediction markets
  • Join our group at LinkedIn to have your “Prediction Markets” badge on your profile. It’s ‘chic’. (“Groups” info should be set as “visible”, in your profile options.) We are 63 this early Saturday morning —keeps growing.
  • If you have been using PayPal to fund your InTrade, TradeSports or BetFair account, please, check that horror story.
  • 48 hours after the launch of the “Prediction Markets” group at LinkedIn, we have already 52 members —both prediction market luminaries and simple people (trading the event derivatives or collecting the market-generated probabilities).

EPS Prediction Markets = Earnings Per Share Prediction Markets – Google

No Gravatar

The top 10 most active prediction markets at HedgeStreet:

Contracts – Time remaining – Underlaying Delayed Price – Bid – Ask – Last – Change
4PM $100 GBP/USD &gt- 2.0075 4h 13m 2.01370 95.00 100.00 95.00 29%
4PM $100 EUR/USD &gt- 1.3575 4h 13m 1.36240 95.00 100.00 89.00 34%
2:30PM $100 Crude Oil &gt- $70.00 2h 43m 69.67 28.50 35.50 29.50 -65%
2:30PM $100 Crude Oil &gt- $69.00 2h 43m 69.67 95.50 100.00 96.00 -1%
$100 Halliburton EPS &gt- $.56 18 days 0.56 76.50 96.50 81.50 -8%
4PM $100 USD/CHF &gt- 1.2150 4h 13m 1.21145 – 8.00 35.00 12%
2:30PM $100 Crude Oil &gt- $69.50 2h 43m 69.67 77.50 79.00 78.00 -16%
2:30PM $100 Crude Oil &gt- $71.00 2h 43m 69.67 – 5.00 6.00 -77%
1:30PM $100 Gold &gt- $657.50 1h 43m 659.6 87.00 91.00 81.50 234%
4PM $100 EUR/USD &gt- 1.3625 4h 13m 1.36240 52.00 66.00 18.50 64%

Technical Note: EPS = Earnings Per Share

&#8212-

HedgeStreet organizes many EPS prediction markets. Here&#8217-s the contract for the Google EPS event derivative excerpted from the HedgeStreet site:

Google EPS

Summary

Google®1 EPS Binary contracts allow traders to take a particular view on the &#8216-Earnings per Share&#8217- number (EPS) reported by Google, Inc. (&#8221-Google&#8221-) for a specific fiscal calendar quarter. At issue is the quarterly EPS number (defined as the net income per common share of stock, non-diluted basis) released by Google for the relevant fiscal quarter. A list of upcoming release dates can be found by visiting the Google website.

Example

Google EPS &gt- $3.55 (18 Jul 07)
This Binary allows traders to take a position on whether the EPS number reported by Google will be greater than $3.55 on July 19, 2007.

Asset
&#8220-Google EPS&#8221- specifies that the underlying for this Binary is the quarterly EPS reported by Google (in US dollars).

Strike Price
&#8220-$3.55&#8243- specifies that payout for this Binary is based solely on quarterly EPS for Google reported on the settlement date is greater than $3.55.

Last Trading Day
&#8220-(18 Jul 07)&#8221- specifies that this Binary will last trade on July 18, 2007.

Position
Buy if you think the quarterly EPS for Google reported in the company&#8217-s earnings release on July 19, 2007 will be greater than $3.55.

Sell if you think the quarterly EPS for Google reported in the company&#8217-s earnings release on July 19, 2007 will be less than or equal to $3.55.

Payout
Buyers make $100 if the quarterly EPS for Google reported in the company&#8217-s earnings release is greater than $3.55 on July 19, 2007.

Sellers make $100 if the quarterly EPS for Google reported in the company&#8217-s earnings release is less than or equal to $3.55 on July 19, 2007.

Definitions

Binary Name Format
[ASSET][STRIKE PRICE][LAST TRADING DAY][POSITION]

Asset
&#8220-Google EPS&#8221- specifies that the underlying for this Binary is the quarterly EPS reported by Google (in US dollars).

Strike Price

Specifies that the payout for this Binary is based solely on whether the quarterly EPS for Google reported in the company&#8217-s earning&#8217-s release on the settlement date is:

&#8220-&gt- $X&#8221- -greater than a specific level, $X.
&#8220-&lt- $X&#8221- -less than a specific level, $X.
&#8220-$X to $Y&#8221- -greater than or equal to $X and less than or equal to $Y (assuming $X &lt- $Y).
&#8220-= $X&#8221- -equal to a specific level, $X.

Last Trading Day
&#8220-(DD MON YY)&#8221- specifies that this Binary will last trade on a specific date, MON DD, YYYY.

Position

Buy if you think the quarterly EPS for Google reported in the company&#8217-s earnings release on the specified settlement date will be greater than the strike price.

Sell if you think the quarterly EPS for Google reported in the company&#8217-s earnings release on the specified settlement date will be less than or equal to the strike price.

Payout
Buyers make $100 if the quarterly EPS for Google reported in the company&#8217-s earnings release is greater than the strike price on the settlement date.

Sellers make $100 if the quarterly EPS for Google reported in the company&#8217-s earnings release is less than or equal to the strike price on the settlement date.

Trading Conventions

Trading Hours
The regular trading hours for Google EPS Binaries is from 8:00 am (ET) to 4:00 pm (ET). The trading of the Google EPS contract is halted at 4:00 pm (ET) on the last trading date.

Regular Trading Days
Google EPS contracts cannot be traded on their settlement date. Otherwise, listed Google EPS contracts can usually be traded any day HedgeStreet is open (see the HedgeStreet Calendar).

Last Trading Day
Google EPS Binaries will stop trading as of the date listed in the Binary&#8217-s name and the &#8220-At a Glance&#8221- table (right). The usual last trading day for Google EPS Binaries is one business day prior to the date on which Google has scheduled to release its Quarterly EPS for the particular fiscal quarter.

Settlement Date
Google EPS Binaries will settle as of the date listed in the &#8220-At a Glance&#8221- table (right). The usual settlement date for Google EPS Binaries is the day of the scheduled Google earning&#8217-s release. HedgeStreet reserves the right to postpone this settlement date if the release of the expiration value is delayed.

Settlement Time
Google EPS Binaries will settle within an hour of 4:00 pm (ET) on the settlement date.

Expiration Value
The expiration value is the number used to determine the settlement value for this Binary. It is the level of the Quarterly EPS of Google, Inc. (&#8221-Google&#8221-) for a specific fiscal calendar quarter, measured in U.S. dollars, as reported by Google in an 8-K Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (&#8221-SEC&#8221-) or, if no such report is issued, as reported in its Quarterly 10-Q Report or Annual 10-K Report, as applicable, filed with the SEC.

For a detailed summary of the Source Agencies providing the expiration values for all Binaries, please refer to the Settlement Source table.

Settlement Value
The settlement value for Google EPS Binary contracts is either $0 or $100.

Speculative Position Limits
There are currently no Position Limits for Google EPS Binary contracts.

Halted Markets
In the event that any market irregularities are declared by HedgeStreet, trading in this Binary market may be halted. If it is determined by HedgeStreet that the market must be halted for any other reason, an explanation will be posted on HedgeStreet&#8217-s website within a reasonable amount of time but no later than 24 hours after the initiation of the halt.

Addition of New Binaries
To provide as extensive and relevant a market as possible, HedgeStreet may add new Binary offerings frequently and at its sole discretion. In some cases, new Binary offerings may affect the demand (and thus in some cases the liquidity and/or trading price) for existing, related Binaries. Traders should consider this dynamic aspect of HedgeStreet when making trading decisions.

Strategies

You can use Google EPS Binaries to speculate.

Speculate
Speculating involves taking a view on the outcome of an economic event with the hope of making a profit.

-Do you feel you have an insight into the future performance of Google?

-Would you like to speculate based on your belief about whether Google EPS will rise, fall, or remain the same?

Conventional investment markets don&#8217-t provide an opportunity for retail investors to speculate on a firm&#8217-s earnings announcements. Binaries let you invest the amount you choose on either increases or decreases in Google EPS.

FAQ

What is Google?
Google, Inc. (&#8221-Google&#8221-) is an American public corporation, specializing in Internet searching and online advertising. The company&#8217-s products and services are Google.com that offers Google Base, Google Video and YouTube. In addition, the firm&#8217-s offering also include: Gmail, Blogger, Google Docs and Spreadsheets, Google GEO (offering earth and local maps), as well as a plethora of other products. Google was founded in 1998 and is headquartered in Mountain View, California.

What are Earnings per Share?

EPS is the portion of a company&#8217-s profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock, serving as an indicator of a firm&#8217-s profitability. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) requires companies&#8217- income statements to report EPS for each of the four major categories of the income statement: continuing operations, discontinued operations, extraordinary items, and net income. EPS for Net Income is calculated as:

(Net Income – Dividends on Preferred Stock)/Weighted Average of Common Shares

Why trade Google EPS?
Earnings results of a public company, including both Earnings per Share (EPS) and Revenue, provide insight into the financial health of such company and provide information on the strength of the industrial segment at large. Earnings results are not themselves securities, although they can influence security prices. There are other key measures of corporate progress, though, as well as other outside macro economic events that also influence the value of a given security. Google EPS Binaries allow traders to speculate on whether Google EPS will increase, decrease, or remain the same (as compared to previous quarter&#8217-s release or various analyst estimates).

What is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)?
Since 1973, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has been the designated organization in the private sector for establishing standards of financial accounting and reporting (US GAAP). They are officially recognized as authoritative by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as the organization responsible for setting accounting standards for public companies in the U.S. The FASB&#8217-s mission is &#8220-to establish and improve standards of financial accounting and reporting for the guidance and education of the public, including issuers, auditors, and users of financial information.&#8221-

What is the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)?

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles refers to a set of accounting principles, standards and procedures that companies use to compile their financial statements set by the FASB. Every country has its own standard accounting practice version of GAAP with standards set by a national governing body. US GAAP is not written in law, although the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that it be followed in financial reporting by publicly-traded companies.

What is the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)?
SEC is a U.S. government commission created by Congress to regulate the securities markets, protect investors and monitor corporate takeovers in the U.S. The SEC requires public companies to disclose meaningful financial and other information to the public. This provides a common pool of knowledge for all investors to use to judge for themselves whether to buy, sell, or hold a particular security. The SEC is composed of five commissioners appointed by the U.S. President and approved by the Senate. The SEC is designed to promote full public disclosure and to protect the investing public against fraudulent and manipulative practices in the securities markets.

Where can I find the most recent Google EPS release?
The Google EPS information is released each quarter and available on the Google or SEC website.

What is the Expiration Value?
The Expiration Value is the Quarterly EPS (net, non-diluted) of Google, Inc. (&#8221-Google&#8221-) for a specific fiscal calendar quarter, measured in U.S. dollars, as reported by Google in an 8-K Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (&#8221-SEC&#8221-) or, if no such report is issued, as reported in its Quarterly 10-Q Report or Annual 10-K Report as applicable, filed with the SEC.

Where can I find background information related to this instrument?
For general EPS background information, we recommend the following:

* Investopedia.com: EPS
* Bloomberg.com Earnings

**The data displayed herein represents certain types of contracts offered on HedgeStreet that have an underlying expiration value based on the quarterly Earnings per Share or Revenue of publicly traded companies listed on a national securities exchange. The data is being provided for informational purposes only and should not be the sole information relied upon in making investment decisions. HedgeStreet does not guarantee or make any representation as to the accuracy and completeness of the information provided.

1 Google® is a registered trade mark of Google, Inc. HedgeStreet, Inc. is not affiliated with Google, Inc. and neither Google, Inc., nor its affiliates, sponsor or endorse HedgeStreet, Inc. in any way.

Next: HEDGESTREET: Earnings Per Share Prediction Markets + Merger And Acquisition Prediction Markets

Previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:

  • The CFTC is going to close the comments in 11 days. We have 11 days left to convince the CFTC to accept FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges, and counter the evil petition organized by the American Enterprise Institute (which has on its payroll Paul Wolfowitz, the bright masterminder of the Iraq war).
  • The definitive proof that FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges (like BetFair and InTrade) are the best organizers of socially valuable prediction markets (like those on global warming and climate change).
  • Fairness Doctrine prediction markets
  • 2 MILLION TRADES LATER: Inkling’s play-money prediction markets are accurate —too.
  • Web Forums on Prediction Markets
  • Jason Ruspini will answer SOME of these CFTC questions. — 12 days left, Jason.
  • QUIZZ OF THE DAY: Which blog is the most open minded?