Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Native apps are reigning on mobiles, but Jakob Nielsen strategically bets on web apps. — [LINK]
- Steven Krivit continues to trash Andrea Rossi and his LENR technology. — [LINK]
- Interview with Adam Lashinsky — [VIDEO]
- Why some people are more innovative — [VIDEO]
- Forbes editor deciphers Steve Jobs’s Apple. — [VIDEO]
- Jason Ruspini rebuts Eric Zitzewitz on the regulation of political prediction markets. — [COMMENT]
- Eric Zitzewitz petitions the CFTC in favor of real-money prediction markets about politics. — [TEXT]
- Global warming is a big scam. — [LINK]
- A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors — [VIDEO]
- The Tragedy of the Commons — [VIDEO]
- Guy Kawasaki on Steve Jobs — [VIDEO]
- Inside Apple — [VIDEO]
- Mitt Romney’s taxes — [LINKS]
- A critique of Apple’s multimedia iBooks. — [LINK]
- Does Apple lack “generosity”? — [LINKS]
- Apple Education Push — [LINKS]
- Water Crystals — [DOCUMENT]
- Apple’s e-book software will allow publishers to make textbooks more interactive. — [LINKS + VIDEO]
- Alain Soral is France’s most dangerous intellectual… (dangerous for the French plutocrats, that is). — [VIDEO]
- Computers thru time — [CHART]
Tag Archives: Andrew Gelman
Political Forecasting: Justin Wolfers vs. Nate Silver
- Andrew Gelman nailed it: In summary, “momentum” can exist, but the places where you’ll see it is in races where current public opinion is out of step with best predictions. The mere information that a race has a 5-point … Continue reading
Posted in Forecasting (Science & Practice)
Tagged Andrew Gelman, forecasting, Justin Wolfers, momemtum, Nate Silver, Politics, random walk, statistics, US politics
1 Comment
Andrew Gelman on forecasting and statistical models
Andrew Gelman visits Google’s Mountain View headquarters: The 2008 presidential election and state polls:
Bayesian Statistics — Scholarpedia Edition
Bayesian Statistics — Scholarpedia Edition Recommended by Him:
Posted in Resources - References, Science
Tagged Andrew Gelman, bayesian statistics, Scholarpedia, statistics
Leave a comment
RE: Andrew Gelman versus Robin Hanson
Andrew Gelman is the most wonderful forecasting expert on Earth. He is great. He is a giant. I like a lot of what he has been retorting to Robin Hanson. However, Andrew Gelman didn’t answer the Robin Hanson challenge, that … Continue reading
Posted in Collective Forecasting, Forecasting (Science & Practice)
Tagged Andrew Gelman, forecasting, Robin Hanson
1 Comment
Robin Hanson to Andrew Gelman: You are a smart prof, but my forecasting methods are better —which means, overall, that I am smarter than you.
Robin Hanson: Since I’ve granted that my story is contrary to what people usually say and assume, saying “I assume†on funding just isn’t much of a contrary argument. “My impression†on students isn’t much better. Your funding patrons may … Continue reading
Andrew Gelman makes more sense than Robin Hanson.
Andrew Gelman: I would go with the commonsensical view that academia is primarily an institution for teaching and research. I think of the credentialing as a byproduct. Sounds logical.
Posted in Psychology
Tagged academia, Andrew Gelman, credentialing, Research, Robin Hanson, teaching
2 Comments
Andrew Gelman teaches a valuable lesson to Robin Hanson: Quit bragging about your high IQ, man.
“there’s more to life –even to academic life– than being smart and insightful.” Excellent point.
Posted in Psychology
Tagged Andrew Gelman, intellectual quotient, intelligence, IQ, Robin Hanson, smart, smartness
Leave a comment
Institutional Decision Analysis
Institutional Decision Analysis – a concept by Andrew Gelman The term “decision analysis” has multiple meanings in Bayesian statistics. When we use the term here, we are not talking about problems of parameter estimation, squared error loss, etc. Rather, we … Continue reading
Robin Hanson is a web community super star.
Andrew Gelman: I’ll write something fuller on my own blog, but I have to admit I envy Robin the lively and thoughtful participation he gets here. Robin is certainly doing something right to be generating this sort of discussion every … Continue reading →