Tag Archives: 2008 US presidential election

Prediction markets didn’t “revolutionize” decision-making —and will never do. However, they are a nice condiment to the classic forecasting toolkit.

I have spent several hours re-reading the 2004 AEI-Brookings book, “Information Markets” (by which they mean “prediction markets”). It is a collection of un-enlightening research articles —except for the IEM article, which is outstanding, both on the factual and theoretical … Continue reading

Posted in All Best Posts Ever, Analysis (Industry), Analysis (Meta), Collective Decision Making, Collective Forecasting, Exchanges & Markets, Forecasting (Science & Practice) | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Prediction markets compute facts and expertise quicker that the mass media do.

Political prediction markets react (with a small delay) to political polls —just like the political experts and the mass media do, too. Hence, in order to discover their true social utility, the prediction markets (which are tools of intelligence) should … Continue reading

Posted in All Best Posts Ever, Analysis (Accuracy & Precision), Analysis (Meta), Exchanges & Markets, Market Expiry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

A graph with a data point for each state, with the horizontal axis representing the polling data and the vertical axis representing the Intrade contract price

Via Andrew Gelman On November 3, 2008:

Posted in All Best Posts Ever, Analysis (Data), Exchanges & Markets, Forecasting (Science & Practice), Market Prices & Probabilities | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The 2 links you should follow, first thing, this Monday morning

- A portrait of Nate Silver in the New York Times. – Jed Christiansen’s post-mortem on the 2008 US presidential elections. I’ll have many remarks to add to his analysis.

Posted in Analysis (Accuracy & Precision), Analysis (Meta), Exchanges & Markets, Forecasting (Science & Practice), Market Prices & Probabilities | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments