InnovateUs = Prediction Markets??

No Gravatar

InnovateUs:

Leveraging The Prediction Market

In a traditional stock market stocks are listed for corporations- and people buy and sell these stocks. The decision to buy or sell is based on the percieved performance of the stock in the future. If you think the profits are going to rise you will buy and if you think the profits are on a decline you would sell.

In the InnovateUs Idea Market stocks are listed for ideas and innovations. If you like an idea and you think the idea has a likely chance of getting accepted within your organization, buy the stock for the idea. The better the idea, more stocks you purchase. The total investment in a stock indicates the overall opinion about the idea.

[…] The anonymous Idea creation gave participants the required impetus to freely suggest ideas without fear of embarrassment and negative repercussions. Seeing the opportunity to win some incentives, participants invested their money wisely. In the end, the management ended up with a ton of great ideas and opinions to guide their decisions. […]

Is that &#8220-prediction markets&#8221-, really!??

Prediction markets dont solve the crystal-ball problem when it comes to the long-term future.

No Gravatar

– Crowdsourcing The Crystal Ball – by Forbes&#8217-s James Surowiecki – 2007-10-15

[…] So what&#8217-s the catch? Only this: We&#8217-re still not sure how far into the future prediction markets can really look, or whether they&#8217-re going to be able to foresee the kind of world- or business-altering events that Tetlock, for instance, asked his experts about.

So far, prediction markets&#8217- track record has been built on predicting events that will occur in the near future, and where the range of variables that might determine that future is reasonably small and well defined. (Elections, sales forecasts and product launch dates all fall into this category.) But prediction markets haven&#8217-t, for the most part, been used to try to predict things like the fall of the Soviet Union, and so it&#8217-s not clear whether a market would really be able to foresee events that represent a dramatic break with the past, rather than an evolution from it.

This hardly means that prediction markets are of little use: The kind of forecasting problems that these markets are good at are fundamental to any business. Using prediction markets internally should have a beneficial effect on a company&#8217-s bottom line.

But it is fair to say that we don&#8217-t know enough yet to say that prediction markets really solve the crystal-ball problem when it comes to the long-term future. What we need now is to start using prediction markets to ask bigger questions, which will eventually help us understand what the problem with forecasting really is: Is it how we&#8217-re trying to predict the future? Or is it that we&#8217-re trying to predict the future at all?

What do you guys/gals think? I&#8217-d go with the idea that it&#8217-s quite impossible to use prediction markets to forecast the long-term future.

Great quote for the prediction markets faithful

It&#8217-s the same each time with progress. First they ignore you, then they say you&#8217-re mad, then dangerous, then there&#8217-s a pause and then you can&#8217-t find anyone who disagrees with you.

&#8211- Tony Benn

Cross-posted from Caveat Bettor.

Read the previous blog posts by Caveat Bettor:

  • The Democrat SC Showdown: Intrade v. Zogby
  • Zogby beats Intrade in predicting Nevada caucus winner Clinton.
  • The GOP SC and Dem NV Showdown: Intrade v. Zogby
  • Latest Intrade v. Zogby contest is up.
  • Who said prediction markets were perfect?
  • Intrade markets and Zogby polls agree in New Hampshire
  • The Iowa Showdown: Zogby v. Intrade