Were the InTrade prediction markets on the November 2006s Senate elections accurate?

No Gravatar

Revisiting the issue, almost one year later.

Lance Fortnow (University of Chicago) wrote:

So how did those predictions go? In short you can say the markets predicted every individual race correctly but got the senate wrong, but let us look a little more carefully.

At about 9 AM CST on the morning of election day I made a snap shot of the map for a Discovery Channel Website article.

Every state colored blue was won by a democrat and every state colored red went to a republican. But also note the 69% given to GOP (Republican) Senate control although this election will give control to the democrats. No outcome would have made all the states and senate control agree with the 9 AM map.

Were the markets inconsistent? No, because the markets predict not absolutely but probabilistically. For example, the markets gave a probability of winning 60% for each of Virginia and Missouri and the democrats needed both to take the senate. If these races were independent events, the probability that the democrats take both is 36% or a 64% chance of GOP senate control assuming no other surprises.

Of course the races were not independent events and there are other states involved making it more difficult to compare the probabilities of the individual races with that of senate control.

So how did the markets do as predictors? Quite well as the outcome seems quite reasonable given the markets. Other outcomes would have also been reasonable such as the Democrats losing Virginia and the senate remaining in republican hands, a possibility that came very close to happening.

Previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:

  • Professor Koleman Strumpf explains the prediction markets to the countryland people.
  • Professor Koleman Strumpf tells CNN that a prediction market, by essence, can’t predict an upset.
  • Time magazine interview the 2 BetFair-Tradefair co-founders, and not a single time do they pronounce the magic words, “prediction markets”.
  • One Deep Throat told me that this VC firm might have been connected with the Irish prediction exchange, at inception.
  • BetFair Rapid = BetFair’s standalone, local, PC-based, order-entry software for prediction markets
  • Michael Moore tells the Democratic people to go Barack Obama in Pennsylvania (a two-tier state), but the polls and the prediction markets tell us that that won’t do the trick.
  • CALLING ALL DEEP THROATS: What is it that Smarkets want to do in Malta, E.U.? And what will Smarkets market anyway?

Are there any prediction markets services you would recommend?

No Gravatar

LinkedIn:

Are there any prediction markets services you would recommend?

Hi all,
I am searching for companies that are specialized in prediction markets. So far I found examples such as newsfutures, nosco, and some more. Have you done business with any of these companies or may there be others you would recommend?
Thanks in advance – Jillian

Jillian Falconi
Innovation Consultant at Saxo Bank

I have answered her request. It&#8217-s a pity I was able to list only three experts in the field of prediction markets. I wanted to give her more names. LinkedIn limits us to three names of experts. Totally stupid&#8230- Sorry to Adam Siegel and Chris Hibbert and others&#8230-

Here&#8217-s the page that this consultant should visit: BEST – the best links about prediction markerts.

Previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:

  • Do join the “Prediction Markets” group at LinkedIn, if you have a strong interest in the prediction markets or if you work in the prediction market industry. It’s free, and that’s a way for the LinkedIn visitors browsing stuff about prediction markets to stumble upon your resume / profile.
  • You can now join the LinkedIn group on Prediction Markets.
  • Nigel Eccles says that HubDub generates “data on peoples’ reputations for accurately analyzing and forecasting future events”.
  • I did drop BetFair from the Midas Oracle coverage of the prediction markets. They should re-establish the direct links, from their 2 frontpages, to the prediction markets on politics, finance, and the other socially valuable issues.
  • I dropped BetFair from the Midas Oracle coverage of the prediction markets. They should re-establish the direct links, from their 2 frontpages, to the prediction markets on politics, finance, and the other socially valuable issues.
  • I am dropping BetFair from the Midas Oracle coverage of the prediction markets —until they re-establish the direct links, from their 2 frontpages, to the prediction markets on politics, finance, and the other socially valuable issues.
  • 2 web links that are not about prediction markets —but which you should check.

Should AEI-Brookings have allowed Midas Oracle to re-publish the text of the economists petition on prediction markets?

No Gravatar

New York Times:

Content Makers Are Accused of Exaggerating Copyright

An association of computer and communication companies, including Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, on Wednesday accused several professional sports leagues, book publishers and other media companies of misleading and threatening consumers with overstated copyright warnings. In a complaint to the Federal Trade Commission, the group, the Computer and Communications Industry Association, said that the National Football League, Major League Baseball, NBC and Universal Studios, DreamWorks, Harcourt and Penguin Group display copyright warnings that are a “systematic misrepresentation of consumers’ rights to use legally acquired content.” The complaint alleges that the warnings may intimidate consumers from making legal use of copyrighted material, like photocopying a page from a book to use in class. […]

At Midas Oracle, we never had any problem with copyright laws&#8230- except when it came to the economists&#8217- petition on prediction markets engineered by AEI-Brookings. We felt that it would have been better if the media and the bloggers were given permission to re-publish the text of the petition on its entirety &#8212-not just the abstract. We felt that it was a case where the goal of the authors was to maximize exposure of their ideas, not to maximize the power of the copyright rights holder.

Another reason to approve Steve Levitt and Koleman Strumpf for not signing the petition.

Previous: Economists’ Petition on Prediction Markets + Squawk on Prediction Markets – by Tom W. Bell + Bob Hahn turns the PETITION into a CONSENSUS. + Steve Levitt of Freakonomics: I WON’T SIGN YOUR PETITION, BOB. + Chris Masse’s comment on the Freakonomics’ blog post about the legality of US prediction markets + Safe Harbor Letter too Timid – by Chris Hibbert + The limitations of logic (and the need for passion) – by Caveat Bettor + Jason Ruspini on the Economists’ Petition