Will the Chicago Mercantile Exchange write to the CFTC?
…- asks Google’-s Bo Cowgill.
That could be…- However, I’-m not holding my breath. Here’-s why. The CME (along side the CBOE and ISDA) represents forces that does not push for the kind of financial innovations we are pushing here, on Midas Oracle. We are pulling for Web-based, de-intermediated, low-cost, event derivative exchanges. The financial dinosaurs (like the CME) do not.
Take a look at the CME’-s 2003 letter to the CFTC about HedgeStreet’-s application as a DCM. – (PDF file) – Here are the titles of the first 2 sections:
- HedgeStreet’s Proposal is Materially Deficient.
- The [HedgeStreet] Application Violates the CEA.
No need to go further. …- You have computed that the CME was (in 2003) no friend of HedgeStreet —-and, thus, of our prediction markets. (For those who are just surfacing from an Afghan cave, yes, the CFTC did approve HedgeStreet’-s application, finally, and told the CME to go fugging themselves.) So, I’-m not holding my breath for a CME comment to the CFTC’-s concept release on “-event markets”-. Saying that the CME is talking for the prediction market community is like saying the Ayatollah Khamenei was talking for priests, ministers, and rabbis.
As for the ISDA, they represent big institutional traders…- who do not use exchanges ( !! ). What they say to the CFTC (PDF file), basically, is to be careful not to hurt the framework of the whole landscape. Well, thanks ISDA, but the CFTC knew that already.
As I said, 2 prediction market organizations will, each, submit their comment to the CFTC. I don’-t expect that to be a deep read, with regards to derivative regulations. However, their industrial strategy might transpire, and that might be interesting for curious people like me.
The 3 interesting takes about the “-event markets”- are from:
- the CFTC —-if you are able to sense what their true opinion is.
- Jason Ruspini —-(PDF file).
- Tom W. Bell —-upcoming.
The future of US-based, non-sports, non-hedgeable prediction markets depends on those 3 poles of thought.
In the coming weeks, you’-ll see many intellectual interactions between them.
The real question is: Will Jason Ruspini and/or Tom W. Bell have a proven impact on the CFTC process? I wish that, but both of them do stray away from the CFTC’-s strict framework.