Prediction market expert Robin Hanson is so right, once again.

Robin Hanson about his concept of decision markets:

[...] A novel approach to policy deserves more attention, including sympathetic discussions, when there is a positive expected payoff from further explorations of it. Such explorations can include math models, lab experiments, and field experiments. A positive payoff comes if such explorations can refine the approach into useful fielded implementations, while a negative payoff comes from wasted effort and harmful implementations. If the cost of experimenting is low and the final positive payoff could be very high, a novel policy approach can be worth exploring even with a very low probability of success.

As I wrote many times here, Robin Hanson’s concept will have applications if you view it as ‘decision-aid markets‘ (where conditional prediction markets are used to assess scenarios) —not ‘decision markets’ (where the machine would decide for us).

All this conditional ( :) ) that Robin Hanson can interest people into trading on his complex prediction markets… That’s the biggest challenge.

About Chris F. Masse

Founder and President of Midas Oracle
This entry was posted in Analysis (Industry), Analysis (Meta), Economics, Inventions & Innovations and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply