The Economist rebuts Paul Krugman.

No GravatarSee the title of that post: &#8220-The market sees all, knows all&#8221-. :-D

The Economist

Read the previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:

  • Is Justin Wolfers a libertarian? Probably not.
  • The information technology that caught Eliot Spitzer
  • Eric Zitzewitz’s 10 minutes of fame
  • Fun with conditional probabilities
  • Wrongly Crafted Headlines Of The Day
  • an American, petite, very pretty brunette, 5 feet 5 inches, and 105 pounds
  • Mississippi: Is it a primary or a caucus?

2 thoughts on “The Economist rebuts Paul Krugman.

  1. Niall O'Connor said:

    Surely, as is noted by a poster to that site, this piece, if it did anything, served to bolster Krugman’s case. It boldly states that;

    “Possibly the most interesting development is that the markets, which as of early this morning favored Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama in delegate-rich California by a 56–44 margin, now give a significant advantage to Mr Obama”

    when, as we all know Clinton won the state!

  2. Niall O'Connor said:

    Surely, as is noted by a poster to that site, this piece, if it did anything, served to bolster Krugman’s case. It boldly states that;

    “Possibly the most interesting development is that the markets, which as of early this morning favored Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama in delegate-rich California by a 56–44 margin, now give a significant advantage to Mr Obama”

    when, as we all know Clinton won the state!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *