Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Native apps are reigning on mobiles, but Jakob Nielsen strategically bets on web apps. — [LINK]
- Steven Krivit continues to trash Andrea Rossi and his LENR technology. — [LINK]
- Interview with Adam Lashinsky — [VIDEO]
- Why some people are more innovative — [VIDEO]
- Forbes editor deciphers Steve Jobs’s Apple. — [VIDEO]
- Jason Ruspini rebuts Eric Zitzewitz on the regulation of political prediction markets. — [COMMENT]
- Eric Zitzewitz petitions the CFTC in favor of real-money prediction markets about politics. — [TEXT]
- Global warming is a big scam. — [LINK]
- A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors — [VIDEO]
- The Tragedy of the Commons — [VIDEO]
- Guy Kawasaki on Steve Jobs — [VIDEO]
- Inside Apple — [VIDEO]
- Mitt Romney’s taxes — [LINKS]
- A critique of Apple’s multimedia iBooks. — [LINK]
- Does Apple lack “generosity”? — [LINKS]
- Apple Education Push — [LINKS]
- Water Crystals — [DOCUMENT]
- Apple’s e-book software will allow publishers to make textbooks more interactive. — [LINKS + VIDEO]
- Alain Soral is France’s most dangerous intellectual… (dangerous for the French plutocrats, that is). — [VIDEO]
- Computers thru time — [CHART]
4 Responses to Google horror story
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This guy seems like a self-glorifying scam artist. From his description it seems his site was one of those content-free ad farms, i.e. the spam of the web.
He wrote: “After pointing out that in the United States of America, the accused are generally given the right to know both the crimes they are being accused of, and the identities of their accusers”
This is silly. He was not accused of a crime. Using Google AdSense is a partnership requiring agreement on both sides, not some kind of right.
“Effectively, Google’s position was that it was above the law”
No, Google’s position was that they are allowed to choose who they do business with.
David Pennock: He won his court battle, it seems. Which gives some weight to his opinion.
So did the woman who spilled coffee on herself
I guess I’m saying the court got it wrong (at least according to the information I saw)
“the court got it wrong”
OK.