-

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581, Attention: Office of the Secretariat. Comments may be sent by facsimile to 202.418.5521, or by e-mail to secretary@cftc.gov.

Reference should be made to the “Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts.” Comments may also be submitted through the Federal eRuleMaking Portal at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leavingFR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Fekrat, Special Counsel, Office of the Director (telephone 202.418.5578, e-mail bfekrat@cftc.gov), Division of Market Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

-

THE MIDAS ORACLE TAKES:

- CALL TO ACTION: Let’s fight so that the CFTC allows the FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges to deal with “event markets”.

- In the for-profit vs not-for-profit debate, our prediction market luminaries, doctored by Bob, are on the wrong side of the issue.

- The definitive proof that FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges (like BetFair and InTrade) are the best organizers of socially valuable prediction markets (like those on global warming and climate change).

- Analysis of the HedgeStreet’s comment sent to the CFTC.

-

BACKGROUND INFO:

- CFTC’s Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts… notably how they define “event markets”, how they are going to extend their “exemption” to other IEM-like prediction exchanges, and how they framed their questions to the public. Here are the comments sent to the CFTC.

- The BusinessWeek news article about the CFTC’s concept release.

- The Arnold & Porter lawyer’s take. — (PDF file)

- The Schulte, Roth & Zabel lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- The Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- Michael Giberson’s economic take.

- Chris Hibbert’s libertarian take.

- Tom W. Bell’s libertarian take.

- The American Enterprise Institute’s proposals to legalize the real-money prediction markets in the United States of America

-

COMMENTS TO THE CFTC

- Very soon, two prediction market organizations and one VIP will submit their comment to the CFTC.

- What Vernon Smith told the CFTC. — (PDF file)

- Jed Christiansen’s pragmatic take. — Final draft – (PDF file) – His comment to the CFTC – (PDF file)

- The International Swaps and Derivatives Association‘s comment to the CFTC – (ISDA) — (PDF file)

- Jason Ruspini’s comment to the CFTC — (PDF file)

- Tom W. Bell’s petition, which will be sent to the CFTC. — (Jonathan Gewirtz is in.)

- HedgeStreet’s comment to the CFTC. — (PDF file)

- A young economist rebuts the American Enterprise Institute. — (MO mirror) — Comment to the CFTC – (PDF file)

- Tom W. Bell rebuts the American Enterprise Institute.

- Robin Hanson’s comment to the CFTC. — (MO mirror)

-

APPENDIX:

Paul Wolfowitz’s profile at the American Enterprise Institute

- How the neo-cons drove the United States of America into the unecessary Iraq war

-

-

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581, Attention: Office of the Secretariat. Comments may be sent by facsimile to 202.418.5521, or by e-mail to secretary@cftc.gov.

Reference should be made to the “Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts.” Comments may also be submitted through the Federal eRuleMaking Portal at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leavingFR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Fekrat, Special Counsel, Office of the Director (telephone 202.418.5578, e-mail bfekrat@cftc.gov), Division of Market Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

-

THE MIDAS ORACLE TAKES:

- CALL TO ACTION: Let’s fight so that the CFTC allows the FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges to deal with “event markets”.

- In the for-profit vs not-for-profit debate, our prediction market luminaries, doctored by Bob, are on the wrong side of the issue.

- The definitive proof that FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges (like BetFair and InTrade) are the best organizers of socially valuable prediction markets (like those on global warming and climate change).

- Analysis of the HedgeStreet’s comment sent to the CFTC.

-

BACKGROUND INFO:

- CFTC’s Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts… notably how they define “event markets”, how they are going to extend their “exemption” to other IEM-like prediction exchanges, and how they framed their questions to the public. Here are the comments sent to the CFTC.

- The Arnold & Porter lawyer’s take. — (PDF file)

- The Schulte, Roth & Zabel lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- The Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- Michael Giberson’s economic take.

- Chris Hibbert’s libertarian take.

- Tom W. Bell’s libertarian take.

- The American Enterprise Institute’s proposals to legalize the real-money prediction markets in the United States of America

-

COMMENTS TO THE CFTC

- Very soon, two prediction market organizations and one VIP will submit their comment to the CFTC.

- What Vernon Smith told the CFTC. — (PDF file)

- Jed Christiansen’s pragmatic take. — Final draft – (PDF file) – His comment to the CFTC – (PDF file)

- The International Swaps and Derivatives Association‘s comment to the CFTC — (ISDA) — (PDF file)

- Jason Ruspini’s comment to the CFTC — (PDF file)

- Tom W. Bell’s petition, which will be sent to the CFTC. — (Jonathan Gewirtz is in.)

- HedgeStreet’s comment to the CFTC. — (PDF file)

- A young economist rebuts the American Enterprise Institute. — (MO mirror) — Comment to the CFTC – (PDF file)

-

APPENDIX:

Paul Wolfowitz’s profile at the American Enterprise Institute

- How the neo-cons drove the United States of America into the unecessary Iraq war

-

-

THE MIDAS ORACLE TAKES:

- CALL TO ACTION: Let’s fight so that the CFTC allows the FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges to deal with “event markets”.

- In the for-profit vs not-for-profit debate, our prediction market luminaries, doctored by Bob, are on the wrong side of the issue.

- The definitive proof that FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges (like BetFair and InTrade) are the best organizers of socially valuable prediction markets (like those on global warming and climate change).

- COMMENTS TO THE CFTC: What to expect from Tom W. Bell and Jason Ruspini

-

BACKGROUND INFO:

- CFTC’s Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts… notably how they define “event markets”, how they are going to extend their “exemption” to other IEM-like prediction exchanges, and how they framed their questions to the public. Here are the comments sent to the CFTC.

- The Arnold & Porter lawyer’s take. — (PDF file)

- The Schulte, Roth & Zabel lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- The Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- Michael Giberson’s economic take.

- Chris Hibbert’s libertarian take.

- Tom W. Bell’s libertarian take.

- The American Enterprise Institute’s proposals to legalize the real-money prediction markets in the United States of America

-

COMMENTS TO THE CFTC

- This week, two prediction market organizations and one VIP will submit their comment to the CFTC.

- What Vernon Smith told the CFTC. — (PDF file)

- Jed Christiansen’s pragmatic take. — Final draft – (PDF file)

- The International Swaps and Derivatives Association‘s comment to the CFTC — (ISDA) — (PDF file)

- Jason Ruspini’s comment to the CFTC — (PDF file)

- A young economist rebuts the American Enterprise Institute. — (MO mirror) — Comment to the CFTC – (PDF file)

-

APPENDIX:

Paul Wolfowitz’s profile at the American Enterprise Institute

- How the neo-cons drove the United States of America into the unecessary Iraq war

-

-

THE MIDAS ORACLE TAKES:

- CALL TO ACTION: Let’s fight so that the CFTC allows the FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges to deal with “event markets”.

- In the for-profit vs not-for-profit debate, our prediction market luminaries, doctored by Bob, are on the wrong side of the issue.

- The definitive proof that FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges (like BetFair and InTrade) are the best organizers of socially valuable prediction markets (like those on global warming and climate change).

- COMMENTS TO THE CFTC: What to expect from Tom W. Bell and Jason Ruspini

-

BACKGROUND INFO:

- CFTC’s Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts… notably how they define “event markets”, how they are going to extend their “exemption” to other IEM-like prediction exchanges, and how they framed their questions to the public. Here are the comments sent to the CFTC.

- The Arnold & Porter lawyer’s take. — (PDF file)

- The Schulte, Roth & Zabel lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- The Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- What Vernon Smith told the CFTC. — (PDF file)

- This week, 4 prediction market organizations and VIPs will submit their comment to the CFTC.

- Michael Giberson’s economic take.

- Chris Hibbert’s libertarian take.

- Tom W. Bell’s libertarian take.

- Jed Christiansen’s pragmatic take. — Final draft – (PDF file)

- A young economist rebuts the American Enterprise Institute. — (MO mirror)

- The American Enterprise Institute’s proposals to legalize the real-money prediction markets in the United States of America

-

APPENDIX:

Paul Wolfowitz’s profile at the American Enterprise Institute

- How the neo-cons drove the United States of America into the unecessary Iraq war

-

-

THE MIDAS ORACLE TAKES:

- CALL TO ACTION: Let’s fight so that the CFTC allows the FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges to deal with “event markets”.

- In the for-profit vs not-for-profit debate, our prediction market luminaries, doctored by Bob, are on the wrong side of the issue.

- The definitive proof that FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges (like BetFair and InTrade) are the best organizers of socially valuable prediction markets (like those on global warming and climate change).

- COMMENTS TO THE CFTC: What to expect from Tom W. Bell and Jason Ruspini

-

BACKGROUND INFO:

- CFTC’s Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts… notably how they define “event markets”, how they are going to extend their “exemption” to other IEM-like prediction exchanges, and how they framed their questions to the public. Here are the comments sent to the CFTC.

- The Arnold & Porter lawyer’s take. — (PDF file)

- The Schulte, Roth & Zabel lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- The Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- What Vernon Smith told the CFTC. — (PDF file)

- This week, 4 prediction market organizations and VIPs will submit their comment to the CFTC.

- Michael Giberson’s economic take.

- Chris Hibbert’s libertarian take.

- Tom W. Bell’s libertarian take.

- Jed Christiansen’s pragmatic take.

- A young economist rebuts the American Enterprise Institute. — (MO mirror)

- The American Enterprise Institute’s proposals to legalize the real-money prediction markets in the United States of America

-

APPENDIX:

Paul Wolfowitz’s profile at the American Enterprise Institute

- How the neo-cons drove the United States of America into the unecessary Iraq war

-

-

THE MIDAS ORACLE TAKES:

- CALL TO ACTION: Let’s fight so that the CFTC allows the FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges to deal with “event markets”.

- In the for-profit vs not-for-profit debate, our prediction market luminaries, doctored by Bob, are on the wrong side of the issue.

- The definitive proof that FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges (like BetFair and InTrade) are the best organizers of socially valuable prediction markets (like those on global warming and climate change).

- COMMENTS TO THE CFTC: What to expect from Tom W. Bell and Jason Ruspini

-

BACKGROUND INFO:

- CFTC’s Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts… notably how they define “event markets”, how they are going to extend their “exemption” to other IEM-like prediction exchanges, and how they framed their questions to the public. Here are the comments sent to the CFTC.

- The Arnold & Porter lawyer’s take. — (PDF file)

- The Schulte, Roth & Zabel lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- The Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- What Vernon Smith told the CFTC. — (PDF file)

- Michael Giberson’s economic take.

- Chris Hibbert’s libertarian take.

- Tom W. Bell’s libertarian take.

- Jed Christiansen’s pragmatic take.

- A young economist rebuts the American Enterprise Institute. — (MO mirror)

- The American Enterprise Institute’s proposals to legalize the real-money prediction markets in the United States of America

-

APPENDIX:

Paul Wolfowitz’s profile at the American Enterprise Institute

- How the neo-cons drove the United States of America into the unecessary Iraq war

-

-

THE MIDAS ORACLE TAKES:

- CALL TO ACTION: Let’s fight so that the CFTC allows the FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges to deal with “event markets”.

- In the for-profit vs not-for-profit debate, our prediction market luminaries, doctored by Bob, are on the wrong side of the issue.

- The definitive proof that FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges (like BetFair and InTrade) are the best organizers of socially valuable prediction markets (like those on global warming and climate change).

- COMMENTS TO THE CFTC: What to expect from Tom W. Bell and Jason Ruspini

-

BACKGROUND INFO:

- CFTC’s Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts… notably how they define “event markets”, how they are going to extend their “exemption” to other IEM-like prediction exchanges, and how they framed their questions to the public. Here are the comments sent to the CFTC.

- The Arnold & Porter lawyer’s take. — (PDF file)

- The Schulte, Roth & Zabel lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- The Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- What Vernon Smith told the CFTC. — (PDF file)

- Michael Giberson’s economic take.

- Chris Hibbert’s libertarian take.

- Tom W. Bell’s libertarian take.

- Jed Christiansen’s pragmatic take.

- A young economist rebuts the American Enterprise Institute.

- The American Enterprise Institute’s proposals to legalize the real-money prediction markets in the United States of America

-

APPENDIX:

Paul Wolfowitz’s profile at the American Enterprise Institute

- How the neo-cons drove the United States of America into the unecessary Iraq war

-

-

THE MIDAS ORACLE TAKES:

- CALL TO ACTION: Let’s fight so that the CFTC allows the FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges to deal with “event markets”.

- In the for-profit vs not-for-profit debate, our prediction market luminaries, doctored by Bob, are on the wrong side of the issue.

- The definitive proof that FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges (like BetFair and InTrade) are the best organizers of socially valuable prediction markets (like those on global warming and climate change).

- COMMENTS TO THE CFTC: What to expect from Tom W. Bell and Jason Ruspini

- A young economist rebuts the American Enterprise Institute.

-

BACKGROUND INFO:

- CFTC’s Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts… notably how they define “event markets”, how they are going to extend their “exemption” to other IEM-like prediction exchanges, and how they framed their questions to the public. Here are the comments sent to the CFTC.

- The Arnold & Porter lawyer’s take. — (PDF file)

- The Schulte, Roth & Zabel lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- The Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- What Vernon Smith told the CFTC.

- Chris Hibbert’s libertarian take.

- The American Enterprise Institute’s proposals to legalize the real-money prediction markets in the United States of America

-

APPENDIX:

Paul Wolfowitz’s profile at the American Enterprise Institute

- How the neo-cons drove the United States of America into the unecessary Iraq war

-

-

- The Arnold & Porter lawyer’s take. — (PDF file)

- The Schulte, Roth & Zabel lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- The Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- A young economist rebuts the American Enterprise Institute.

-

-

THE MIDAS ORACLE TAKES:

- CALL TO ACTION: Let’s fight so that the CFTC allows the FOR-PROFIT prediction exchanges to deal with “event markets”.

- In the for-profit vs not-for-profit debate, our prediction market luminaries, doctored by Bob, are on the wrong side of the issue.

- COMMENTS TO THE CFTC: What to expect from Tom W. Bell and Jason Ruspini

- A young economist rebuts the American Enterprise Institute.

-

BACKGROUND INFO:

- CFTC’s Concept Release on the Appropriate Regulatory Treatment of Event Contracts… notably how they define “event markets”, how they are going to extend their “exemption” to other IEM-like prediction exchanges, and how they framed their questions to the public. Here are the comments sent to the CFTC.

- The Arnold & Porter lawyer’s take. — (PDF file)

- The Schulte, Roth & Zabel lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- The Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers’ take. — (PDF file)

- What Vernon Smith told the CFTC.

- The American Enterprise Institute’s proposals to legalize the real-money prediction markets in the United States of America

- Chris Hibbert’s libertarian take.

-

APPENDIX:

Paul Wolfowitz’s profile at the American Enterprise Institute

- How the neo-cons drove the United States of America into the unecessary Iraq war

-