Prof Andrew Gelman on “predicting” and “forecasting”

Andrew Gelman:

I suspect the words have different meanings in different contexts.  In statistics, “prediction” is often used even when the result has already happened:  that is, if you have a model, y = f(x) + error, then f(x) is said to be the “predicted” value.  So you can have a predicted value, even for an observation you’ve seen.  I’ve worked in an example using climate models where the term “hindcast” was used, because we were fitting a model from 40 years of data and then using it to predict values that had already occurred.

In common usage, I think “prediction” refers to predictions of the future. Consider the famous Niels Bohr quote, “Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.”  I assume he as being ironic and was assuming that prediction is always about the future.  I can only assume forecasting is also about the future, given the “fore” at the beginning of the word.  So I don’t really know the difference between prediction and forecasting.

I’ve never heard the term “collective forecasting,” but I’m sure that reflects my ignorance rather than anything else.

Previously: Apple dictionary on “predicting” vs “forecasting”

Andrew Gelman’s website

Andrew Gelman’s excellent blog

Andrew Gelman sometimes guest-blog at Nate Silver’s blog.

NEXT: Predicting = Forecasting –> Collective Forecasting = Collective Intelligence That Predicts

About Chris F. Masse

Founder and President of Midas Oracle
This entry was posted in Analysis (Meta), Collective Forecasting, Explainers, Forecasting (Science & Practice) and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply