Prediction Markets + Market Predictions = Collective Forecasting That Pays Off
You can follow all the replies to this entry through the comments feed.
Paul Hewitt on The Real Arithmetic Of The Health Care Reform
Chris F. Masse on The Real Arithmetic Of The Health Care Reform
Jason Ruspini on Nate Silver: InTrade probability on ObamaCare is quite right.Jason Ruspini on “In 1965, Congress said Medicare would cost $9 billion by 1990. In reality, it cost $67 billion –seven times more than the prediction.”Paul Hewitt on The Real Arithmetic Of The Health Care ReformChris F. Masse on “In 1965, Congress said Medicare would cost $9 billion by 1990. In reality, it cost $67 billion –seven times more than the prediction.”Chris F. Masse on “In 1965, Congress said Medicare would cost $9 billion by 1990. In reality, it cost $67 billion –seven times more than the prediction.”Chris F. Masse on “In 1965, Congress said Medicare would cost $9 billion by 1990. In reality, it cost $67 billion –seven times more than the prediction.”Paul Hewitt on “In 1965, Congress said Medicare would cost $9 billion by 1990. In reality, it cost $67 billion –seven times more than the prediction.”Chris F. Masse on “In 1965, Congress said Medicare would cost $9 billion by 1990. In reality, it cost $67 billion –seven times more than the prediction.”
Eistein was right…
“I never think of the future. It comes soon enough.”
http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the the universe.”
I thought that we have iterated many many times that prediction markets that do not fail are not accurate…
Why reporting on *one* expired prediction market is no fun… when using the scientific approach
http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/05/28/reporting-scientifically-on-the-expired-prediction-markets-is-no-fun/