Using prediction markets to selecting the best ideas as opposed to judging accuracy of predictions on measurable outcomes?

I don’t get it, but you can always go there and scan that illogical Motorola EPM story.

About Chris F. Masse

Founder and President of Midas Oracle
This entry was posted in Analysis (Meta), Cases, Exchanges & Markets, Forecasting (Science & Practice) and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Using prediction markets to selecting the best ideas as opposed to judging accuracy of predictions on measurable outcomes?

  1. Medemi says:

    It doesn’t work. You will get all sorts of impractical ideas (even some that have failed more than once in the past) which will grab all the attention. People generally are very poor at judging what works and what doesn’t. Can’t let common sense be the judge of true genius.

  2. I’ve been blogging about this for a year now, and I still belive that prediction markets aren’t the right tool for selecting ideas. While it can be done, there are by far better tools.

    http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/05/05/prediction-markets-using-them-for-innovation-and-ideas/
    http://blog.mercury-rac.com/2008/08/03/wisdom-of-crowds-and-innovation-its-not-working/

  3. Medemi says:

    You wasted a whole year on this?

    Things tend to get pretty dangerous for companies when managements gets all exited about this. But it’s only Motorola so who cares anyway.

  4. Heh… no, I haven’t “wasted” a year on this. Just that I’ve been writing/blogging about it over the past year as more companies seem to be interested in trying it. :)

    Unfortunately, it’s not just Motorola. A good number of companies have tried (or currently do) the exact same thing.

  5. Thanks for your links to your blog, Jed. It was great posts.

Leave a Reply