<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journal of Predictions Markets: Special Issue on Corporate Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/04/28/journal-of-predictions-markets-special-issue-on-corporate-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/04/28/journal-of-predictions-markets-special-issue-on-corporate-applications/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets + Market Predictions = Collective Forecasting That Pays Off</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:33:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Koleman Strumpf</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/04/28/journal-of-predictions-markets-special-issue-on-corporate-applications/#comment-24061</link>
		<dc:creator>Koleman Strumpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=13679#comment-24061</guid>
		<description>Jason:

These articles were definitely peer reviewed: two rounds plus per paper, hence the delay in publication relative to the conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason:</p>
<p>These articles were definitely peer reviewed: two rounds plus per paper, hence the delay in publication relative to the conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/04/28/journal-of-predictions-markets-special-issue-on-corporate-applications/#comment-24028</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=13679#comment-24028</guid>
		<description>I remember reading that this was peer-reviewed, but I don&#039;t know to what extent it is actually reviewed.  There was one article a year or two back that seemed to contain some misunderstandings about risk aversion.  This lack of clarity implied that play-money rank-order markets should not suffer risk-seeking distortions.  Perhaps it was reviewed but no-one had an incentive to point this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading that this was peer-reviewed, but I don&#8217;t know to what extent it is actually reviewed.  There was one article a year or two back that seemed to contain some misunderstandings about risk aversion.  This lack of clarity implied that play-money rank-order markets should not suffer risk-seeking distortions.  Perhaps it was reviewed but no-one had an incentive to point this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/04/28/journal-of-predictions-markets-special-issue-on-corporate-applications/#comment-23989</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 21:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=13679#comment-23989</guid>
		<description>Maybe they should publish some articles for free on the Web, and sell the others. Or maybe they should publish all their articles for free ---maybe it will create a buzz and it will help them sell dead-tree copies.

In any case, the model they have right now is dubious, at the age of the Internet.

P.S.: Does the Journal talk about non-trading information aggregation mechanisms? It should, since NewsFutures (the pioneer) and CrowdCast (the VC-funded) have abandoned market mechanisms (a la Hanson).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they should publish some articles for free on the Web, and sell the others. Or maybe they should publish all their articles for free &#8212;maybe it will create a buzz and it will help them sell dead-tree copies.</p>
<p>In any case, the model they have right now is dubious, at the age of the Internet.</p>
<p>P.S.: Does the Journal talk about non-trading information aggregation mechanisms? It should, since NewsFutures (the pioneer) and CrowdCast (the VC-funded) have abandoned market mechanisms (a la Hanson).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/04/28/journal-of-predictions-markets-special-issue-on-corporate-applications/#comment-23988</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 20:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=13679#comment-23988</guid>
		<description>$32.09 each article? That&#039;s pretty sad. Who is going to read these?

I once made a completely useless contract on this http://home.inklingmarkets.com/stocks/346/trades/new

New versions

http://home.inklingmarkets.com/stocks/65142/trades/new

http://www.hubdub.com/m40638/Will_the_Journal_of_Prediction_Markets_be_in_the_Directory_of_Open_Access_Journals_before_201111</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$32.09 each article? That&#8217;s pretty sad. Who is going to read these?</p>
<p>I once made a completely useless contract on this <a href="http://home.inklingmarkets.com/stocks/346/trades/new" rel="nofollow">http://home.inklingmarkets.com/stocks/346/trades/new</a></p>
<p>New versions</p>
<p><a href="http://home.inklingmarkets.com/stocks/65142/trades/new" rel="nofollow">http://home.inklingmarkets.com/stocks/65142/trades/new</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hubdub.com/m40638/Will_the_Journal_of_Prediction_Markets_be_in_the_Directory_of_Open_Access_Journals_before_201111" rel="nofollow">http://www.hubdub.com/m40638/Will_the_Journal_of_Prediction_Markets_be_in_the_Directory_of_Open_Access_Journals_before_201111</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
