Yet another reason why we should *not* call it the “Prediction Market Institute”…
So what about a system to evaluate us prognosticators? Professor Tetlock suggests that various foundations might try to create a “trans-ideological Consumer Reports for punditry,†monitoring and evaluating the records of various experts and pundits as a public service. I agree: Hold us accountable!
Should we set up a registry of track records —in addition to our prediction market stuff?…
Who needs pundits’ track records when we have prediction markets?
http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/26/pundits-track-records-prediction-markets/