<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Civics Exchange = CFTC-regulated Exempt Board of Trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/23/american-civics-exchange-cftc-regulated-exempt-board-of-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/23/american-civics-exchange-cftc-regulated-exempt-board-of-trade/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/23/american-civics-exchange-cftc-regulated-exempt-board-of-trade/#comment-27640</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=13313#comment-27640</guid>
		<description>Why does the CFTC allow the Cantor Exchange and not InTrade?

http://www.midasoracle.org/2010/03/16/cftc-real-money-prediction-markets-movie-business-politics-sports/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the CFTC allow the Cantor Exchange and not InTrade?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2010/03/16/cftc-real-money-prediction-markets-movie-business-politics-sports/" rel="nofollow">http://www.midasoracle.org/2010/03/16/cftc-real-money-prediction-markets-movie-business-politics-sports/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/23/american-civics-exchange-cftc-regulated-exempt-board-of-trade/#comment-23775</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=13313#comment-23775</guid>
		<description>http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2009/03/24/crack-for-wonks.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2009/03/24/crack-for-wonks.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2009/03/24/crack-for-wonks.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/23/american-civics-exchange-cftc-regulated-exempt-board-of-trade/#comment-23765</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=13313#comment-23765</guid>
		<description>InTrade did get approval for their eBOT. They didn&#039;t follow their plan.

Note: WeatherBill also started with ECPs, and has recently received CFTC approval to fish out on a broader scale. More in a post later on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>InTrade did get approval for their eBOT. They didn&#8217;t follow their plan.</p>
<p>Note: WeatherBill also started with ECPs, and has recently received CFTC approval to fish out on a broader scale. More in a post later on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Horowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/23/american-civics-exchange-cftc-regulated-exempt-board-of-trade/#comment-23763</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Horowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=13313#comment-23763</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve really upped the ante on &quot;qualified&quot; or &quot;accredited&quot; investors. 10 million net for an individual to trade? I am guessing this will be lowered over time, but still unlikely to go below one million. (I&#039;m also guessing this is why Intrade didn&#039;t get approved, they didn&#039;t want to eliminate 99.99% of their users by agreeing to a 10 mil net qualifier. )

Good luck increasing liquidity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve really upped the ante on &#8220;qualified&#8221; or &#8220;accredited&#8221; investors. 10 million net for an individual to trade? I am guessing this will be lowered over time, but still unlikely to go below one million. (I&#8217;m also guessing this is why Intrade didn&#8217;t get approved, they didn&#8217;t want to eliminate 99.99% of their users by agreeing to a 10 mil net qualifier. )</p>
<p>Good luck increasing liquidity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

