I am re-reading a 2007 scientific article from Region Focus’ Vanessa Sumo:
- Ask The Market – Companies are leading the way in the use of prediction markets. The public sector may soon follow. – (PDF)
Here is what I see on the frontpage:
- “one or two weeks in advance“
- “even up to five weeks in advance“
Marketing-wise, velocity is a much more potent argument than the argument on accuracy. Who cares about an added accuracy of +2.7% (and that’s debated)? If any, that’s peanuts.
You cannot make a case against velocity. Impossible.
-
UPDATE: Put the PDF link in the address box of your browser (as opposed to clicking on it, or right-clicking on it).
http://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/region_focus/2007/spring/pdf/feature1.pdf
I prefer the term efficiency. Velocity sounds pseudo-scientific and is less general. And without a certain minimum of relative accuracy, efficiency won’t matter.
Yes, I get you.