<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prediction markets react to polls.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/#comment-23554</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=12509#comment-23554</guid>
		<description>Inkling Markets CEO Adam Siegel speaks out on the current state of enterprise prediction markets.
http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/01/inkling-markets-ceo-adam-siegel-speaks-out-on-the-current-state-of-enterprise-prediction-markets/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inkling Markets CEO Adam Siegel speaks out on the current state of enterprise prediction markets.<br />
<a href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/01/inkling-markets-ceo-adam-siegel-speaks-out-on-the-current-state-of-enterprise-prediction-markets/" rel="nofollow">http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/03/01/inkling-markets-ceo-adam-siegel-speaks-out-on-the-current-state-of-enterprise-prediction-markets/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/#comment-23397</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=12509#comment-23397</guid>
		<description>The truth about prediction markets
http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/02/14/the-truth-about-prediction-markets/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth about prediction markets<br />
<a href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/02/14/the-truth-about-prediction-markets/" rel="nofollow">http://www.midasoracle.org/2009/02/14/the-truth-about-prediction-markets/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are they afraid? &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/#comment-23238</link>
		<dc:creator>Are they afraid? &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=12509#comment-23238</guid>
		<description>[...] F. Masse January 8th, 2009 Bo Cowgill and Midas Oracle are the only media to have published about the Lee/Moretti paper. We are awaiting insightful takes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] F. Masse January 8th, 2009 Bo Cowgill and Midas Oracle are the only media to have published about the Lee/Moretti paper. We are awaiting insightful takes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Censorship? &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/#comment-23225</link>
		<dc:creator>Censorship? &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 09:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=12509#comment-23225</guid>
		<description>[...] F. Masse January 5th, 2009 Midas Oracle is the only media to have published about the Lee/Moretti paper. Is there censorship going on? Here is the listing of the prediction [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] F. Masse January 5th, 2009 Midas Oracle is the only media to have published about the Lee/Moretti paper. Is there censorship going on? Here is the listing of the prediction [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/#comment-23220</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=12509#comment-23220</guid>
		<description>From what I saw in the final two weeks, non-longshot state-level divergences between Intrade and 538 mainly came down to latency in 538 updates.  It seemed like the markets interpreted new polls earlier, creating divergences that largely disappeared when 538 was updated hours later.  

About the paper, the markets may have immediately integrated new poll data as they should, but smoothed/averaged the news with traders&#039; previous outlooks.  If you superimpose the charts as above, it will look like the markets are integrating polls with a delay.. or are they instead reflecting polls immediately but discounting them?  Replacing the market prices with 538&#039;s output on the percentage scale above probably looks the same, as 538 smoothed new polls.  New polls are noisy and it&#039;s desirable to wait for confirmation before jumping to the conclusion suggested by the latest poll.  As the prediction is made to respond more quickly, the risk of head-fakes increases, like we see in the first three poll spikes above.  If you have two series with the same mean absolute error, the more volatile series will score worse with squared or log errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I saw in the final two weeks, non-longshot state-level divergences between Intrade and 538 mainly came down to latency in 538 updates.  It seemed like the markets interpreted new polls earlier, creating divergences that largely disappeared when 538 was updated hours later.  </p>
<p>About the paper, the markets may have immediately integrated new poll data as they should, but smoothed/averaged the news with traders&#8217; previous outlooks.  If you superimpose the charts as above, it will look like the markets are integrating polls with a delay.. or are they instead reflecting polls immediately but discounting them?  Replacing the market prices with 538&#8242;s output on the percentage scale above probably looks the same, as 538 smoothed new polls.  New polls are noisy and it&#8217;s desirable to wait for confirmation before jumping to the conclusion suggested by the latest poll.  As the prediction is made to respond more quickly, the risk of head-fakes increases, like we see in the first three poll spikes above.  If you have two series with the same mean absolute error, the more volatile series will score worse with squared or log errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/#comment-23214</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=12509#comment-23214</guid>
		<description>And go fugging yourself with the comparison between the polls and the prediction markets. Enough already with that. You should compare PMs with the mass media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And go fugging yourself with the comparison between the polls and the prediction markets. Enough already with that. You should compare PMs with the mass media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/#comment-23213</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=12509#comment-23213</guid>
		<description>Mike, small states with few polls had prediction markets with thin liquidity whose probabilities reflected those polls.
I would say that.
I didn&#039;t investigat that closely, to be honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, small states with few polls had prediction markets with thin liquidity whose probabilities reflected those polls.<br />
I would say that.<br />
I didn&#8217;t investigat that closely, to be honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/#comment-23212</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=12509#comment-23212</guid>
		<description>David, so did the markets move when Nate posted?Â  Should be testable.

Chris, what was driving political prediction markets lacking relevant polls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, so did the markets move when Nate posted?Â  Should be testable.</p>
<p>Chris, what was driving political prediction markets lacking relevant polls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/#comment-23210</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=12509#comment-23210</guid>
		<description>Polls, poll aggregators and poll analysts were driving the political prediction markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polls, poll aggregators and poll analysts were driving the political prediction markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Horowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/12/30/prediction-markets-react-to-polls/#comment-23207</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Horowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=12509#comment-23207</guid>
		<description>I believe Nate (fivethirtyeight.com) was driving the prediction markets based on his analysis of the polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Nate (fivethirtyeight.com) was driving the prediction markets based on his analysis of the polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

