It’s “pretty clear” that the prediction markets on political elections aggregate information from the polls —and from the political experts.
-
Previously: #1 – #2 – #3 – #4 – #5 – #6
-
It’s “pretty clear” that:
- InTrade has been over-selling the predicting power of its prediction markets.
- The prediction markets are information aggregation systems —not magical tools.
- The main benefit of a prediction market is to express an aggregated expected probability. Most of the times, this is of low utility.
- In complicated situations, this aggregation will contrast well with a poor reporting. In these instances, the prediction market is a useful source of information.
-




























I tend to agree. However there is an interesting analysis on whether markets follow polls here: http://flowingdata.com/2008/10.....sus-polls/
(Spoiler alert: it shows the markets leading polls)
The truth about prediction markets
http://www.midasoracle.org/200.....n-markets/