<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Intrade bettors expected Mr. Obama to end up with 364 votes in the Electoral College &#8212;one less than he actually got.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/24/364-votes-in-the-electoral-college/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/24/364-votes-in-the-electoral-college/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets + Market Predictions = Collective Forecasting That Pays Off</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:30:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Are prediction markets useful to you? &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/24/364-votes-in-the-electoral-college/#comment-22964</link>
		<dc:creator>Are prediction markets useful to you? &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=11696#comment-22964</guid>
		<description>[...] #1 - #2 - #3 - #4 - #5 - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #1 &#8211; #2 &#8211; #3 &#8211; #4 &#8211; #5 &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are prediction markets useful? &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/24/364-votes-in-the-electoral-college/#comment-22930</link>
		<dc:creator>Are prediction markets useful? &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=11696#comment-22930</guid>
		<description>[...] #1 - #2 - #3 - #4 - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #1 &#8211; #2 &#8211; #3 &#8211; #4 &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Still, as noted, it was a good election for prediction markets and another piece of evidence of their superiority over the pundits (and at least parity with the poll).&#8221; &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/24/364-votes-in-the-electoral-college/#comment-22916</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Still, as noted, it was a good election for prediction markets and another piece of evidence of their superiority over the pundits (and at least parity with the poll).&#8221; &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=11696#comment-22916</guid>
		<description>[...] John Tierney linked to that Huffington Post that listed the pundits&#8217; predictions about the total number of electoral votes that each presidential candidate would take. But I disagree with that way of predicting the electoral college and assessing these predictions. With this completely flawed method, if you are damn wrong on a state and damn wrong (in the opposite way) about another state that has the exact same number of electoral votes, then you are a bright genius worth the Nobel prize of forecasting. Gimme a break. Enough with that voodoo way of assessing predictions about the electoral college. Do the assessment state by state. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Tierney linked to that Huffington Post that listed the pundits&#8217; predictions about the total number of electoral votes that each presidential candidate would take. But I disagree with that way of predicting the electoral college and assessing these predictions. With this completely flawed method, if you are damn wrong on a state and damn wrong (in the opposite way) about another state that has the exact same number of electoral votes, then you are a bright genius worth the Nobel prize of forecasting. Gimme a break. Enough with that voodoo way of assessing predictions about the electoral college. Do the assessment state by state. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Tierney responds to Chris Masse &#8212;but John Tierney is still mistaken about the real social utility of the InTrade prediction markets. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/24/364-votes-in-the-electoral-college/#comment-22904</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tierney responds to Chris Masse &#8212;but John Tierney is still mistaken about the real social utility of the InTrade prediction markets. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=11696#comment-22904</guid>
		<description>[...] Previously [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Previously [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElectoralMap.net has been over-selling InTrade&#8217;s predictive power to the public &#8212;as John Tierney&#8217;s just done. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/24/364-votes-in-the-electoral-college/#comment-22903</link>
		<dc:creator>ElectoralMap.net has been over-selling InTrade&#8217;s predictive power to the public &#8212;as John Tierney&#8217;s just done. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=11696#comment-22903</guid>
		<description>[...] They don&#8217;t tell the public that InTrade has just aggregated the state polls, which were quite accurate &#8212;giving a little plus to Obama in Missouri, where the polls were saying that &#8220;Missouri [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They don&#8217;t tell the public that InTrade has just aggregated the state polls, which were quite accurate &#8212;giving a little plus to Obama in Missouri, where the polls were saying that &#8220;Missouri [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
