My answer is: they can be. To quote myself from the article you linked to:
“While [prediction markets] are on par with the accuracy of the best poll aggregators, their forecasts are real-time and reflect the state of the race right now.”
“their forecasts are real-time and reflect the state of the race right now.”
-
That’s not a huge benefit for the people out there. They are not news junkies.
-
We have to dig more to find the real benefits of the prediction markets.
-
” their forecasts are real-time and reflect the state of the race right now.â€
-
In a sense, the forecasts done by the poll aggregators (Nate Silver and Electoral-Vote.com) are also updated every day —which is a high enough frequency for most people.
-
Heh… okay, I’ll bite.
My answer is: they can be. To quote myself from the article you linked to:
“While [prediction markets] are on par with the accuracy of the best poll aggregators, their forecasts are real-time and reflect the state of the race right now.”
But they won’t always be useful.
“their forecasts are real-time and reflect the state of the race right now.”
-
That’s not a huge benefit for the people out there. They are not news junkies.
-
We have to dig more to find the real benefits of the prediction markets.
-
Perhaps that’s our disagreement. I think that a real-time state-of-the-race is valuable.
To news junkies like you and moi. Not to the real people out there.
Pingback: Don’t pump up the features of the prediction markets —instead, put the emphasis on their benefits. | Midas Oracle .ORG
” their forecasts are real-time and reflect the state of the race right now.â€
-
In a sense, the forecasts done by the poll aggregators (Nate Silver and Electoral-Vote.com) are also updated every day —which is a high enough frequency for most people.
-