<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oops.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/07/california-ban-gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/07/california-ban-gay-marriage/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Nielsen &#187; Biweekly links for 11/10/2008</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/07/california-ban-gay-marriage/#comment-22683</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Nielsen &#187; Biweekly links for 11/10/2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=11282#comment-22683</guid>
		<description>[...] Intrade gets California Prop. 8 completely wrong. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Intrade gets California Prop. 8 completely wrong. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Carver</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/11/07/california-ban-gay-marriage/#comment-22656</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Carver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=11282#comment-22656</guid>
		<description>I understand that CA approved a similar ban 8 years ago, and polls were showing a slight lead to the Yes side, so the pricing on the contract seems a bit surprising...
-
Perhaps people just play on a lark with amounts so small that they consider it throw-away money and don&#039;t do significant research?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that CA approved a similar ban 8 years ago, and polls were showing a slight lead to the Yes side, so the pricing on the contract seems a bit surprising&#8230;<br />
-<br />
Perhaps people just play on a lark with amounts so small that they consider it throw-away money and don&#8217;t do significant research?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

