<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does &#8220;Competitive Forecasting&#8221; belong to NewsFutures?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/10/24/competitive-forecasting-newsfutures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/10/24/competitive-forecasting-newsfutures/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/10/24/competitive-forecasting-newsfutures/#comment-22282</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=10784#comment-22282</guid>
		<description>&quot;In other words, the claimant would have to show that by dint of long exposure to its use in a commercial context, consumers had come to understand the mark not as a mere description but as the name of the claimantâ€™s service.&quot;
-
I&#039;d bet on &quot;no&quot;.
-
Emile started off that brand in 2006 only, and other thinkers are using this term to mean other things.
-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In other words, the claimant would have to show that by dint of long exposure to its use in a commercial context, consumers had come to understand the mark not as a mere description but as the name of the claimantâ€™s service.&#8221;<br />
-<br />
I&#8217;d bet on &#8220;no&#8221;.<br />
-<br />
Emile started off that brand in 2006 only, and other thinkers are using this term to mean other things.<br />
-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Competitive Forecasting&#8221; (the brand which NewsFutures&#8217; Emile Servan-Schreiber is so sanguine about) is probably more than a generic mark, it might well be a descriptive mark &#8212;provided X, Y and Z. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/10/24/competitive-forecasting-newsfutures/#comment-22278</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Competitive Forecasting&#8221; (the brand which NewsFutures&#8217; Emile Servan-Schreiber is so sanguine about) is probably more than a generic mark, it might well be a descriptive mark &#8212;provided X, Y and Z. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=10784#comment-22278</guid>
		<description>[...] F. Masse October 26th, 2008 Tom W. Bell - (a law professor who have been following the field of prediction markets for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] F. Masse October 26th, 2008 Tom W. Bell &#8211; (a law professor who have been following the field of prediction markets for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/10/24/competitive-forecasting-newsfutures/#comment-22276</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=10784#comment-22276</guid>
		<description>Very interesting comment, thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting comment, thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom W. Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/10/24/competitive-forecasting-newsfutures/#comment-22275</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom W. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=10784#comment-22275</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m right here, Chris--a loyal reader!


My two cents on &quot;competitive forecasting&quot;: Â It probably rises above a merely generic mark, which could never be protected, because it is not the commonplace name for the service to which it refers. Â It more likely qualifies as a descriptive mark, and as such could be protected only if &quot;secondary meaning&quot; were proven. Â In other words, the claimant would have to show that by dint of long exposure to its use in a commercial context, consumers had come to understand the mark not as a mere description but as the name of the claimant&#039;s service. Â Whether or not &quot;competitive forecasting&quot; can meet that test remains a question of fact, of course.


Caveat: Â I speak only of U.S. law, though most common law countries follow similar principles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m right here, Chris&#8211;a loyal reader!</p>
<p>My two cents on &#8220;competitive forecasting&#8221;: Â It probably rises above a merely generic mark, which could never be protected, because it is not the commonplace name for the service to which it refers. Â It more likely qualifies as a descriptive mark, and as such could be protected only if &#8220;secondary meaning&#8221; were proven. Â In other words, the claimant would have to show that by dint of long exposure to its use in a commercial context, consumers had come to understand the mark not as a mere description but as the name of the claimant&#8217;s service. Â Whether or not &#8220;competitive forecasting&#8221; can meet that test remains a question of fact, of course.</p>
<p>Caveat: Â I speak only of U.S. law, though most common law countries follow similar principles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/10/24/competitive-forecasting-newsfutures/#comment-22266</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=10784#comment-22266</guid>
		<description>Congrats for being a pioneer.
But that&#039;s only one aspect of the problematic.
Let&#039;s say a company has &quot;invented&quot; this term, and is using it to describe a product.
Now, let&#039;s say that scholars and people are now using this term to describe a class of products.
Then, that company would lose its trademark (registered or not).
If it&#039;s a common term, then it can&#039;t be a trademark.
That&#039;s why I have always advised businesses to register trademarks that are not generic. Non-generic trademarks (&quot;Nike&quot;, &quot;Apple&quot;, &quot;Philips&quot;, &quot;HubDub&quot;, etc.) are more difficult to establish at first, but, long term, they win over weaker brands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats for being a pioneer.<br />
But that&#8217;s only one aspect of the problematic.<br />
Let&#8217;s say a company has &#8220;invented&#8221; this term, and is using it to describe a product.<br />
Now, let&#8217;s say that scholars and people are now using this term to describe a class of products.<br />
Then, that company would lose its trademark (registered or not).<br />
If it&#8217;s a common term, then it can&#8217;t be a trademark.<br />
That&#8217;s why I have always advised businesses to register trademarks that are not generic. Non-generic trademarks (&#8220;Nike&#8221;, &#8220;Apple&#8221;, &#8220;Philips&#8221;, &#8220;HubDub&#8221;, etc.) are more difficult to establish at first, but, long term, they win over weaker brands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emile Servan-Schreiber</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/10/24/competitive-forecasting-newsfutures/#comment-22265</link>
		<dc:creator>Emile Servan-Schreiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=10784#comment-22265</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty clear that NewsFutures invented the term back in 2006 to refer to a &lt;em&gt;specific &lt;/em&gt;new collective prediction tool it started fielding at the time as an alternative to &quot;prediction markets&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty clear that NewsFutures invented the term back in 2006 to refer to a <em>specific </em>new collective prediction tool it started fielding at the time as an alternative to &#8220;prediction markets&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

