John McCain will announce soon who will be the Republican vice presidential nominee.
Reading the Press this early Thursday morning does not give any insider’s clues.
-
-
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Native apps are reigning on mobiles, but Jakob Nielsen strategically bets on web apps. — [LINK]
- Steven Krivit continues to trash Andrea Rossi and his LENR technology. — [LINK]
- Interview with Adam Lashinsky — [VIDEO]
- Why some people are more innovative — [VIDEO]
- Forbes editor deciphers Steve Jobs’s Apple. — [VIDEO]
- Jason Ruspini rebuts Eric Zitzewitz on the regulation of political prediction markets. — [COMMENT]
- Eric Zitzewitz petitions the CFTC in favor of real-money prediction markets about politics. — [TEXT]
- Global warming is a big scam. — [LINK]
- A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors — [VIDEO]
- The Tragedy of the Commons — [VIDEO]
- Guy Kawasaki on Steve Jobs — [VIDEO]
- Inside Apple — [VIDEO]
- Mitt Romney’s taxes — [LINKS]
- A critique of Apple’s multimedia iBooks. — [LINK]
- Does Apple lack “generosity”? — [LINKS]
- Apple Education Push — [LINKS]
- Water Crystals — [DOCUMENT]
- Apple’s e-book software will allow publishers to make textbooks more interactive. — [LINKS + VIDEO]
- Alain Soral is France’s most dangerous intellectual… (dangerous for the French plutocrats, that is). — [VIDEO]
- Computers thru time — [CHART]
Chris, when linking to InTrade VP markets, remember they are offering two variants – one with a “field” contract and another, newer market, with an “others upon request” option.
In the Dems case, the older field-option seemed to be more liquid and otherwise better performin.
In the post you link to Romney’s contract in the newer request-option market, but you could have also linked to the Romney contract in the older field-option market. (I tried to insert the chart here, but the comment system won’t let me. -MG)
Interestingly, in the Dems case the older market seemed to have much higher total volume, wwhile in the GOP case the markets look more comparable in volumes.