<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Robin Hanson is right to freak out about the upcoming CFTC ruling on &#8220;event markets&#8221; (prediction markets)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/07/23/robin-hanson-cftc-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/07/23/robin-hanson-cftc-2/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets For All</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/07/23/robin-hanson-cftc-2/#comment-20847</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7720#comment-20847</guid>
		<description>With political markets, I am much much more optimistic than "never".  With reasonable trading restrictions and other rules in place, there is little argument that political markets are not excluded commodities, and that some could not be self-certified.
.
The CFTC generally does not regulate against insider trading, as opposed to manipulation.  The insider trading rules Hedgestreet and I propose are mainly to conform to the definition of excluded commodity by avoiding outcome manipulation. CME argues that such rules are unnecessary, citing the role of the Fed in determining interest rate policy.  I tend to think that is a special case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With political markets, I am much much more optimistic than &#8220;never&#8221;.  With reasonable trading restrictions and other rules in place, there is little argument that political markets are not excluded commodities, and that some could not be self-certified.<br />
.<br />
The CFTC generally does not regulate against insider trading, as opposed to manipulation.  The insider trading rules Hedgestreet and I propose are mainly to conform to the definition of excluded commodity by avoiding outcome manipulation. CME argues that such rules are unnecessary, citing the role of the Fed in determining interest rate policy.  I tend to think that is a special case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
