<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InTrade CEO John Delaney&#8217;s comment to the CFTC about &#8220;event markets&#8221; (prediction markets) was so good that even a BetFair shareholder loved it.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/07/17/intrade-cftc-sean-park/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/07/17/intrade-cftc-sean-park/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/07/17/intrade-cftc-sean-park/#comment-20764</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7590#comment-20764</guid>
		<description>You want to say &quot;public interest exemption&quot; instead of &quot;exempt commodities&quot;.Â  The former is what the IEM and others argue for.Â  Only I mentioned &quot;exempt commodities&quot; as part of a possibly more robust jurisdictional framework with respect to gaming laws, though election, tax and policy markets with the appropriate trading restrictions in place are clearly &quot;excluded commodities&quot;.Â  I don&#039;t see the CFTC ruling such markets out as excluded commodities even if none are launched anytime soon because of the overarching political environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want to say &#8220;public interest exemption&#8221; instead of &#8220;exempt commodities&#8221;.Â  The former is what the IEM and others argue for.Â  Only I mentioned &#8220;exempt commodities&#8221; as part of a possibly more robust jurisdictional framework with respect to gaming laws, though election, tax and policy markets with the appropriate trading restrictions in place are clearly &#8220;excluded commodities&#8221;.Â  I don&#8217;t see the CFTC ruling such markets out as excluded commodities even if none are launched anytime soon because of the overarching political environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

