<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robin Hanson&#8217;s purity test is based on an absurd principle.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/07/08/robin-hansons-purity-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/07/08/robin-hansons-purity-test/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets For All</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/07/08/robin-hansons-purity-test/#comment-20221</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7471#comment-20221</guid>
		<description>Again, important for what purpose?  The CFTC was clear that they are concerned about how to keep generic gambling from slipping in via whatever they might approve.  I was addressing that concern.  I don't see how you can read anything I said as arguing against liquidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, important for what purpose?  The CFTC was clear that they are concerned about how to keep generic gambling from slipping in via whatever they might approve.  I was addressing that concern.  I don&#8217;t see how you can read anything I said as arguing against liquidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
