<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grave problem with MSR that Robin Hanson and/or exchange executives should address</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/29/grave-problem-with-msr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/29/grave-problem-with-msr/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/29/grave-problem-with-msr/#comment-19681</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7373#comment-19681</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a problem with MSR, just the use of MSR.Â  Whoever subsidized the decision markets on Intrade seems to have suffered over $1000 of losses across all those markets in January because they set the initial prices at 50% when they obviously should have been lower given the definition of the contract and democrat electoral chances:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intrade.com/index.jsp?request_operation=trade&amp;request_type=action&amp;selConID=565199&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.intrade.com/index.jsp?request_operation=trade&amp;request_type=action&amp;selConID=565199&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a problem with MSR, just the use of MSR.Â  Whoever subsidized the decision markets on Intrade seems to have suffered over $1000 of losses across all those markets in January because they set the initial prices at 50% when they obviously should have been lower given the definition of the contract and democrat electoral chances:<br />
<a href="http://www.intrade.com/index.jsp?request_operation=trade&amp;request_type=action&amp;selConID=565199" rel="nofollow">http://www.intrade.com/index.jsp?request_operation=trade&#038;request_type=action&#038;selConID=565199</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

