Grave problem with MSR that Robin Hanson and/or exchange executives should address

When there’re few trades (in this case, only 3), the last price/probability is too much dependent on the initial price set up by the exchange manager.

-

Nigel, you f***ed it up. I want your apology letter posted on Midas Oracle no later than Monday morning. I want you full of contrition.

And you need to tell your traders how you’re going to interpret an “exemption”. An “exemption” is in between a “license” (or, more exactly, being subject to the CFTC’s regulation) and an outright “exclusion”. It’s in between.

-

About Chris F. Masse

Founder and President of Midas Oracle
This entry was posted in Exchange & Market Designs, Exchanges & Markets, Market Prices & Probabilities, Mechanism Designs and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Grave problem with MSR that Robin Hanson and/or exchange executives should address

  1. Jason Ruspini says:

    It’s not a problem with MSR, just the use of MSR.  Whoever subsidized the decision markets on Intrade seems to have suffered over $1000 of losses across all those markets in January because they set the initial prices at 50% when they obviously should have been lower given the definition of the contract and democrat electoral chances:
    http://www.intrade.com/index.jsp?request_operation=trade&request_type=action&selConID=565199

Leave a Reply