<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the CFTC agree to license and regulate real-money Prediction Markets?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets For All</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grave problem with MSR that Robin Hanson and/or exchange executives should address &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/#comment-19633</link>
		<dc:creator>Grave problem with MSR that Robin Hanson and/or exchange executives should address &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7367#comment-19633</guid>
		<description>[...] When there&#8217;s little trades (in this case, only 3), the last price/probability is too much dependent on the initial price set up by the exchange manager. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When there&#8217;s little trades (in this case, only 3), the last price/probability is too much dependent on the initial price set up by the exchange manager. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/#comment-19630</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7367#comment-19630</guid>
		<description>@Nigel Eccles: "Exempting" is in between "licensing" and "outlawing".
-
It's in between.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nigel Eccles: &#8220;Exempting&#8221; is in between &#8220;licensing&#8221; and &#8220;outlawing&#8221;.<br />
-<br />
It&#8217;s in between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Chris, I wanted to make a comment on Midas Oracle, but the anti-spam mechanism ate my comment.&#8221; &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/#comment-19628</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Chris, I wanted to make a comment on Midas Oracle, but the anti-spam mechanism ate my comment.&#8221; &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7367#comment-19628</guid>
		<description>[...] for that, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for that, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/#comment-19626</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7367#comment-19626</guid>
		<description>@Nigel Eccles: "OK - Wordpress just killed my longer comment (grrr…)"
-
I use WP Spam Free to protect the comments from spammers.
http://www.hybrid6.com/webgeek/plugins/wp-spamfree
-
It's better to log in first before making a comment here. That way, you bypass the anti-spam tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nigel Eccles: &#8220;OK - Wordpress just killed my longer comment (grrr…)&#8221;<br />
-<br />
I use WP Spam Free to protect the comments from spammers.<br />
<a href="http://www.hybrid6.com/webgeek/plugins/wp-spamfree" rel="nofollow">http://www.hybrid6.com/webgeek/plugins/wp-spamfree</a><br />
-<br />
It&#8217;s better to log in first before making a comment here. That way, you bypass the anti-spam tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Eccles</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/#comment-19621</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Eccles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7367#comment-19621</guid>
		<description>OK - Wordpress just killed my longer comment (grrr...)

If it is unclear then we would escalate the question on settlement for discussion. If it is felt that there is no clear answer then it would be voided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK - Wordpress just killed my longer comment (grrr&#8230;)</p>
<p>If it is unclear then we would escalate the question on settlement for discussion. If it is felt that there is no clear answer then it would be voided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/#comment-19619</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7367#comment-19619</guid>
		<description>The question is muddy.  With the payroll futures, I meant that those markets are arguably sufficient to already expire the contract at 100. Otherwise, I might change my opinion about exemptions and the contract.

The contract's initial price was low, not 50%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is muddy.  With the payroll futures, I meant that those markets are arguably sufficient to already expire the contract at 100. Otherwise, I might change my opinion about exemptions and the contract.</p>
<p>The contract&#8217;s initial price was low, not 50%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/#comment-19617</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7367#comment-19617</guid>
		<description>@Jason Ruspini: U didn't answer the price issue. Something to hide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jason Ruspini: U didn&#8217;t answer the price issue. Something to hide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/#comment-19616</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7367#comment-19616</guid>
		<description>@Jason Ruspini: "depending on how the exemption is worded"
-
muddy
-
"The CFTC already regulates event contracts in the form of payroll futures"
-
not an exemption</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jason Ruspini: &#8220;depending on how the exemption is worded&#8221;<br />
-<br />
muddy<br />
-<br />
&#8220;The CFTC already regulates event contracts in the form of payroll futures&#8221;<br />
-<br />
not an exemption</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/28/cftc-license-and-regulate/#comment-19615</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7367#comment-19615</guid>
		<description>Yes, and depending on how the exemption is worded, it might or might not be sufficient to expire the contract at 100.  The CFTC already regulates event contracts in the form of payroll futures though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and depending on how the exemption is worded, it might or might not be sufficient to expire the contract at 100.  The CFTC already regulates event contracts in the form of payroll futures though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
