<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A libertarian view on the Internet betting and gambling industry in the United States of America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/27/a-libertarian-view-on-the-internet-betting-and-gambling-industry-in-the-united-states-of-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/27/a-libertarian-view-on-the-internet-betting-and-gambling-industry-in-the-united-states-of-america/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets For All</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/27/a-libertarian-view-on-the-internet-betting-and-gambling-industry-in-the-united-states-of-america/#comment-19586</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7362#comment-19586</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;"The last thing any poker player with an understanding of economics would ever want is a bill that taxes and regulates online gaming.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; "
-
I think that tax and regulation would be one of the first things any poker player with an understanding of economics would want :-D .  Regulation is needed to ensure software deals cards out at random between users, and to ensure users are on a level playing field.  You can't have fleecing websites set up where some people have access to what cards people hold etcetera, as that really isn't poker.
-
All leisure activities should be taxed too, unless they provide a benefit to society.  In the case of swimming pools, there is a strong argument to subsidise swimming, as the health benefits to users mean that the cost to the health service from poor health is reduced of the population.  Poker doesn't have material benefits like this, and so should pay its fair share of tax, and in return operate within a legal, regulated framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>&#8220;The last thing any poker player with an understanding of economics would ever want is a bill that taxes and regulates online gaming.</em></strong> &#8221;<br />
-<br />
I think that tax and regulation would be one of the first things any poker player with an understanding of economics would want <img src='http://www.midasoracle.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> .  Regulation is needed to ensure software deals cards out at random between users, and to ensure users are on a level playing field.  You can&#8217;t have fleecing websites set up where some people have access to what cards people hold etcetera, as that really isn&#8217;t poker.<br />
-<br />
All leisure activities should be taxed too, unless they provide a benefit to society.  In the case of swimming pools, there is a strong argument to subsidise swimming, as the health benefits to users mean that the cost to the health service from poor health is reduced of the population.  Poker doesn&#8217;t have material benefits like this, and so should pay its fair share of tax, and in return operate within a legal, regulated framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/27/a-libertarian-view-on-the-internet-betting-and-gambling-industry-in-the-united-states-of-america/#comment-19585</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7362#comment-19585</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class="story_main_body_font"&gt;The House Financial Services Committee voted 32-32 on an amendment by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., to block the Federal Reserve and Department of Treasury from completing the new rules until the agencies defined "unlawful Internet gambling."
http://www.lvrj.com/business/21712069.html
-
&lt;/span&gt;The Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department have been unable to finalize rules to implement the ban because Congress didn't clearly define online gambling when it passed legislation less than two years ago.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gSosJ3yBl86H6_d8cUo1a3tZgCgAD91HDHVO4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="story_main_body_font">The House Financial Services Committee voted 32-32 on an amendment by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., to block the Federal Reserve and Department of Treasury from completing the new rules until the agencies defined &#8220;unlawful Internet gambling.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.lvrj.com/business/21712069.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lvrj.com/business/21712069.html</a><br />
-<br />
</span>The Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department have been unable to finalize rules to implement the ban because Congress didn&#8217;t clearly define online gambling when it passed legislation less than two years ago.<br />
<a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gSosJ3yBl86H6_d8cUo1a3tZgCgAD91HDHVO4" rel="nofollow">http://ap.google.com/article/A.....AD91HDHVO4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
