<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A libertarian view on the Internet betting and gambling industry in the United States of America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/27/a-libertarian-view-on-the-internet-betting-and-gambling-industry-in-the-united-states-of-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/27/a-libertarian-view-on-the-internet-betting-and-gambling-industry-in-the-united-states-of-america/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/27/a-libertarian-view-on-the-internet-betting-and-gambling-industry-in-the-united-states-of-america/#comment-19586</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7362#comment-19586</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;The last thing any poker player with an understanding of economics wouldÂ ever want is a bill that taxes and regulates online gaming.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &quot;
-
I think that tax and regulation would be one of the first things any poker player with an understanding of economics would want :-D .Â  Regulation is needed to ensure software deals cards out at random between users, and to ensure users are on a level playing field.Â  You can&#039;t have fleecing websites set up where some people have access to what cards people hold etcetera, as that really isn&#039;t poker.
-
All leisure activities should be taxed too, unless they provide a benefit to society.Â  In the case of swimming pools, there is a strong argument to subsidise swimming, as the health benefits to users mean that the cost to the health service from poor health is reduced of the population.Â  Poker doesn&#039;t have material benefits like this, and so should pay its fair share of tax, and in return operate within a legal, regulated framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>&#8220;The last thing any poker player with an understanding of economics wouldÂ ever want is a bill that taxes and regulates online gaming.</em></strong> &#8221;<br />
-<br />
I think that tax and regulation would be one of the first things any poker player with an understanding of economics would want <img src='http://www.midasoracle.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' />  .Â  Regulation is needed to ensure software deals cards out at random between users, and to ensure users are on a level playing field.Â  You can&#8217;t have fleecing websites set up where some people have access to what cards people hold etcetera, as that really isn&#8217;t poker.<br />
-<br />
All leisure activities should be taxed too, unless they provide a benefit to society.Â  In the case of swimming pools, there is a strong argument to subsidise swimming, as the health benefits to users mean that the cost to the health service from poor health is reduced of the population.Â  Poker doesn&#8217;t have material benefits like this, and so should pay its fair share of tax, and in return operate within a legal, regulated framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/06/27/a-libertarian-view-on-the-internet-betting-and-gambling-industry-in-the-united-states-of-america/#comment-19585</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=7362#comment-19585</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;story_main_body_font&quot;&gt;The House Financial Services Committee voted 32-32 on an amendment by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., to block the Federal Reserve and Department of Treasury from completing the new rules until the agencies defined &quot;unlawful Internet gambling.&quot;
http://www.lvrj.com/business/21712069.html
-
&lt;/span&gt;The Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department have been unable to finalize rules to implement the ban because Congress didn&#039;t clearly define online gambling when it passed legislation less than two years ago.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gSosJ3yBl86H6_d8cUo1a3tZgCgAD91HDHVO4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="story_main_body_font">The House Financial Services Committee voted 32-32 on an amendment by Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., to block the Federal Reserve and Department of Treasury from completing the new rules until the agencies defined &#8220;unlawful Internet gambling.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.lvrj.com/business/21712069.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lvrj.com/business/21712069.html</a><br />
-<br />
</span>The Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department have been unable to finalize rules to implement the ban because Congress didn&#8217;t clearly define online gambling when it passed legislation less than two years ago.<br />
<a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gSosJ3yBl86H6_d8cUo1a3tZgCgAD91HDHVO4" rel="nofollow">http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gSosJ3yBl86H6_d8cUo1a3tZgCgAD91HDHVO4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

