<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I don&#8217;t believe in VP prediction markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The vetting of the many potential Democratic vice president nominees was not as secretive as I thought. &#8212; Bo Cowgill was right, in hindsight. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/#comment-21236</link>
		<dc:creator>The vetting of the many potential Democratic vice president nominees was not as secretive as I thought. &#8212; Bo Cowgill was right, in hindsight. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=6906#comment-21236</guid>
		<description>[...] Bo Cowgill, back in May 2008 (when I started to act as a prophet of doom): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bo Cowgill, back in May 2008 (when I started to act as a prophet of doom): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t trade on the VP predictions markets. &#8212; Don&#8217;t bet on Hillary Clinton as VP. &#8212; Don&#8217;t listen to betting bloggers who tell you that Hillary Clinton has a chance. &#8212; Don&#8217;t believe in &#8220;vice presidential selec</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/#comment-19065</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t trade on the VP predictions markets. &#8212; Don&#8217;t bet on Hillary Clinton as VP. &#8212; Don&#8217;t listen to betting bloggers who tell you that Hillary Clinton has a chance. &#8212; Don&#8217;t believe in &#8220;vice presidential selec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=6906#comment-19065</guid>
		<description>[...] I have stong reservations about those VP prediction markets. Only 2 men in the world know what is going to happen: Barack Obama, and John McCain. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have stong reservations about those VP prediction markets. Only 2 men in the world know what is going to happen: Barack Obama, and John McCain. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JIMMY CARTER: Picking up Hillary Clinton on the Democratic ticket &#8220;would be the worst mistake that could be made&#8221;. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/#comment-19025</link>
		<dc:creator>JIMMY CARTER: Picking up Hillary Clinton on the Democratic ticket &#8220;would be the worst mistake that could be made&#8221;. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=6906#comment-19025</guid>
		<description>[...] I have stong reservations about those VP prediction markets. (But Bo compels me to publish about them anyway.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have stong reservations about those VP prediction markets. (But Bo compels me to publish about them anyway.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who will be the next US Vice President, past January 2009? &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/#comment-18885</link>
		<dc:creator>Who will be the next US Vice President, past January 2009? &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=6906#comment-18885</guid>
		<description>[...] Bo Cowgill, I have stong reservations about those VP prediction markets. Read this WSJ post, for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bo Cowgill, I have stong reservations about those VP prediction markets. Read this WSJ post, for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caveat bettor</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/#comment-18668</link>
		<dc:creator>caveat bettor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=6906#comment-18668</guid>
		<description>Surely we agree that the error rates for such a secretive process would be quite high, but wouldn&#039;t the marginal value of a predicition market in such cases, relative to more transparent processes, be higher as well?

There&#039;s no balance in looking at one side of the ledger (in this case, the risk side, ignoring the reward side).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely we agree that the error rates for such a secretive process would be quite high, but wouldn&#8217;t the marginal value of a predicition market in such cases, relative to more transparent processes, be higher as well?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no balance in looking at one side of the ledger (in this case, the risk side, ignoring the reward side).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABC 20/20 &#8212; A good (but servile) explainer on the wisdom of crowds and the prediction markets &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/#comment-18653</link>
		<dc:creator>ABC 20/20 &#8212; A good (but servile) explainer on the wisdom of crowds and the prediction markets &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=6906#comment-18653</guid>
		<description>[...] purpose. That is complete bullshit. That is pure hype. As I said yesterday, an analyst should check whether a given prediction market is really able of aggregating important information. Just because John Delaney wants to create a betting market to get money doesn&#8217;t mean that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] purpose. That is complete bullshit. That is pure hype. As I said yesterday, an analyst should check whether a given prediction market is really able of aggregating important information. Just because John Delaney wants to create a betting market to get money doesn&#8217;t mean that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STRAIGHT FROM OUR U-TURN DEPARTMENT: Here are the VP prediction markets &#8212;all of them. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/#comment-18625</link>
		<dc:creator>STRAIGHT FROM OUR U-TURN DEPARTMENT: Here are the VP prediction markets &#8212;all of them. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=6906#comment-18625</guid>
		<description>[...] you love the Web? Within 15 minutes of my posting my absolute and definitive refusal to publish any bits about the VP prediction markets, I received a long rebuttal by Google&#8217;s Bo Cowgill &#8212;whose great prediction market paper [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you love the Web? Within 15 minutes of my posting my absolute and definitive refusal to publish any bits about the VP prediction markets, I received a long rebuttal by Google&#8217;s Bo Cowgill &#8212;whose great prediction market paper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/#comment-18624</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=6906#comment-18624</guid>
		<description>@Bo: Great, a polÃ©mique. :-D
-
The common ground is that:
- I should cover them;
- but with the mention that I don&#039;t think they can aggregate all info.
-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bo: Great, a polÃ©mique. <img src='http://www.midasoracle.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
-<br />
The common ground is that:<br />
- I should cover them;<br />
- but with the mention that I don&#8217;t think they can aggregate all info.<br />
-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/05/15/vp-prediction-markets/#comment-18623</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/?p=6906#comment-18623</guid>
		<description>This is dumb. Cover them if something interesting happens. Maybe your theory will turn out to be wrong. Anyhow: Although the decision is made in secrecy, the Presidential nominees have a number incentives which we have plenty of information about. Specifically:
* They want someone who will balance their tickets in terms of geography, race and class. 
* They want someone who will help with weak areas of their campaigns. 
* They want someone who will be a good campaign surrogate -- giving good speeches and attacking the opponents effectively. 
* They want to avoid a VP who will de-motivate or offend the base. 
* They want to avoid someone with a bunch of skeletons in the closet such as angry ex-wives, out-of-wedlock kids, etc. 
* Etc etc.
Anyhow, I don&#039;t see any reason to ignore these markets in case something interesting happens. I read Midas Oracle so that I don&#039;t *have* to read a whole bunch of other websites!
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is dumb. Cover them if something interesting happens. Maybe your theory will turn out to be wrong. Anyhow: Although the decision is made in secrecy, the Presidential nominees have a number incentives which we have plenty of information about. Specifically:<br />
* They want someone who will balance their tickets in terms of geography, race and class.<br />
* They want someone who will help with weak areas of their campaigns.<br />
* They want someone who will be a good campaign surrogate &#8212; giving good speeches and attacking the opponents effectively.<br />
* They want to avoid a VP who will de-motivate or offend the base.<br />
* They want to avoid someone with a bunch of skeletons in the closet such as angry ex-wives, out-of-wedlock kids, etc.<br />
* Etc etc.<br />
Anyhow, I don&#8217;t see any reason to ignore these markets in case something interesting happens. I read Midas Oracle so that I don&#8217;t *have* to read a whole bunch of other websites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

