<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Hampshire is just another &#8220;Pentagon moment&#8221; for political prediction markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/new-hampshire-is-just-another-pentagon-moment-for-political-prediction-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/new-hampshire-is-just-another-pentagon-moment-for-political-prediction-markets/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets For All</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/new-hampshire-is-just-another-pentagon-moment-for-political-prediction-markets/#comment-16671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/new-hampshire-is-just-another-pentagon-moment-for-political-prediction-markets/#comment-16671</guid>
		<description>Michael, I generally agree but maybe we should use this episode to re-galvanize a push for legal prediction markets in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I generally agree but maybe we should use this episode to re-galvanize a push for legal prediction markets in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris. F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/new-hampshire-is-just-another-pentagon-moment-for-political-prediction-markets/#comment-16669</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris. F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/new-hampshire-is-just-another-pentagon-moment-for-political-prediction-markets/#comment-16669</guid>
		<description>I hate to say that, but you could be right coz I see many bloggers coming to the defense of the prediction markets. See my updated list here:
http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/prediction-market-industry-association-useless-so-far/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say that, but you could be right coz I see many bloggers coming to the defense of the prediction markets. See my updated list here:<br />
<a href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/prediction-market-industry-association-useless-so-far/" rel="nofollow">http://www.midasoracle.org/200.....ss-so-far/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Giberson</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/new-hampshire-is-just-another-pentagon-moment-for-political-prediction-markets/#comment-16654</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Giberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/new-hampshire-is-just-another-pentagon-moment-for-political-prediction-markets/#comment-16654</guid>
		<description>True, people looking for magical devices will go elsewhere, but that is okay.
.
People willing to spend money to improve their forecasts, they are the people to appeal to.  Sure, some of these people also hope for a magical tool to make uncertainty go "poof" and disappear, but several more practical risk takers willing to consider evidence will have prediction markets pop up on their radar screen.
.
I want to convince people who have practical risk and uncertainty problems and who would benefit from better tools to address that uncertainty and who will look at evidence. I don't want to be in the business of selling hokum powder and reading palms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, people looking for magical devices will go elsewhere, but that is okay.<br />
.<br />
People willing to spend money to improve their forecasts, they are the people to appeal to.  Sure, some of these people also hope for a magical tool to make uncertainty go &#8220;poof&#8221; and disappear, but several more practical risk takers willing to consider evidence will have prediction markets pop up on their radar screen.<br />
.<br />
I want to convince people who have practical risk and uncertainty problems and who would benefit from better tools to address that uncertainty and who will look at evidence. I don&#8217;t want to be in the business of selling hokum powder and reading palms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris. F. Masse</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/new-hampshire-is-just-another-pentagon-moment-for-political-prediction-markets/#comment-16653</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris. F. Masse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/2008/01/10/new-hampshire-is-just-another-pentagon-moment-for-political-prediction-markets/#comment-16653</guid>
		<description>"A lot of attention is being paid to prediction markets, and it looks bad, but ultimately it will turn out just fine."
.
When people realize that prediction markets are not magical, will they still mind them? That's the one-million-dollar question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A lot of attention is being paid to prediction markets, and it looks bad, but ultimately it will turn out just fine.&#8221;<br />
.<br />
When people realize that prediction markets are not magical, will they still mind them? That&#8217;s the one-million-dollar question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
