Prediction Markets = Collective Forecasting = Collective Intelligence That Predicts

Please, make WordPress a bit like Wikipedia.

No Gravatar

Folks, here is my proposal to the WordPress developers:

Assign a great number of editors to some specific pages

Right now, if you are an editor in WordPress, you can edit any posts and pages. Hence, the administrator of a big group blog would not have many editors —because the blog posters would not like the idea that their colleagues can edit their posts.

But it would be great to be able to have a great number of editors for some specific pages. That way, any group blog powered by WordPress would be able to tap in the “wisdom of crowds” (see James Surowiecki book by the same name) —the same way Wikipedia does. For more on Wikipedia, see these two posts.

Collective intelligence (a.k.a. wisdom of crowds) is a mechanism at the heart of Google PageRank, Wikipedia, open-source software, prediction markets, etc. It is very powerful. WordPress could tap into that very easily, by allowing a page-by-page editing role.

The WP admin would set who are the editor(s) of a particular page —one registered person, two, a bunch of blog authors… or any internet citizens like in Wikipedia.

Thanks a lot for your attention. Contact me for more info, or leave a comment below.

NEXT: WordPress is a bit like WikiMedia (the software powering Wikipedia), now.

Share This:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Turn this article into a PDF!
  • Print this article!
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Bookmarks
  • HackerNews
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Twitter
  • Wikio
  • Yahoo! Buzz

21 Comments to Please, make WordPress a bit like Wikipedia.

  1. December 21, 2007 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

    If they don’t fix it, you could just make a wiki at wiki.midasoracle.org or something.

  2. February 17, 2008 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Wordpress was developed for a single blogger in mind. The idea of having wordpress with multiple users came a bit after, with the boom of blogs. You can always find a wiki plugin to compensate though.

  3. April 16, 2008 at 3:23 am | Permalink

    Agreed, it’s an interesting concept that would definitely get the cycle of creativity flowing. My concern is that it would also get the spam wheels turning with little ability to jam a stick in the spokes, if you know what I mean.

    Overall definitely something for discussion though. Is this something Wordpress have acknowledged?

  4. April 24, 2008 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    That would be a great idea. There are many platforms out there currently that are comprised of many, many authors/editors and they are powerhouses. They are extremely authoritative and offer the reader/consumer a never ending supply of different topics, ideas, perceptions. etc. I think it would be a great idea. Nice post.

  5. April 27, 2008 at 5:53 am | Permalink

    Really good idea. Might not be good for all things, but there are certain things which WP users from all over can collectively contribute to and we all can learn and share from each other’s experiences. Even in a simple matter like plugins each has a different and personal favorite and if we could put all the plugins used collectively in a single place then how easy it would be to pick and choose new plugins that one has not heard of before.

  6. April 29, 2008 at 8:50 am | Permalink

    @flower – There are many sites that are setup this way and have little to no spam because they are moderated along with using anti-spam software. It takes some effort but it cold be done. It would not be just a free for all in terms of authors.

  7. May 5, 2008 at 7:22 pm | Permalink

    hmm… it’d be tricky to make it safe against spammers without using up all the appilcations as anti-smamware and still make it run quickly and efficiently… then again, wiki seems to be doing just fine!

  8. Bob's Gravatar BobNo Gravatar
    May 17, 2008 at 2:34 am | Permalink

    Thats a great concept!
    IF you do develop a plugin, let me know, ill even buy it off you =D

  9. May 19, 2008 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    Not a bad idea, the quality would certainly improve.

  10. May 23, 2008 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Good idea, but the editors must be their responsibility proven, and not delay posts for weeks.

    /Zaga Bjælkehuse – Denmark

  11. May 25, 2008 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    With the surge of Web 2.0 these days, many website have been integrating their functions with Wikipedia!Wordpress + Wikipedia brings the biggest 2 W’s into the game :) Good idea (i do the same in my forum)

  12. May 28, 2008 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    I think you could certainly get around the issue of spam – like someone else said, Wikipedia seems to be doing just fine – and I do think this could really benefit in some cases.  I know I would have liked to have had a few more editors for some of my blogs in the past.

  13. June 4, 2008 at 5:42 am | Permalink

    IMHO with WordPress you can build little “Wiki-like” project. Big projects needs special engine.

  14. June 4, 2008 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    A Wordpress Wiki would make a great addition to a WP blog as well allowing visitors to contribute as well.

  15. June 6, 2008 at 1:13 am | Permalink

    Hi There

    I think that wordpress is deliberately designed to leave this out by default. It is designed in the first instance for a single blogger. You can use a wiki plug-in to add this feature if you so choose, but I think the idea of wordpress default configurations is “blogging for beginners”.

    Think about your great Uncle Bill who wants to try out this blogging thing he’s heard about. He goes to wordpress and starts up a blog. Then come the Spammers, requesting access to edit his site. Bill, not knowing what these requests really mean & just clicking allows them access. Then all the inappropriate sites start filling up his blog… page after page. Your Uncle Bill not knowing how to stop them now gives up on this “silly blogging idea” and “knew he shouldn’t bothered with this modern mumbo jumbo to begin with.”

    Wordpress now have one less satisfied customer who is running around telling all of his friends that this blogging stuff is garbage.

    Just MHO.

  16. June 11, 2008 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    I’m not so sure I agree with this. Wordpress has become the leader at what they do and one reason is that they haven’t lost focus. They do blogging and do it very well. There are already fine wiki engines available. Keep the focus Wordpress.

  17. Baba's Gravatar BabaNo Gravatar
    July 17, 2008 at 2:02 am | Permalink

    Interesting that this thread is running for half a year. Here are some platforms that apparently combine blogs and wiki:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliki
    Comments, anyone?

    Twiki looks very solid but, perhaps, a bit too solid – enterprise class with enterprise-level hosting and consultants.

    Spam is a non-issue. A wiki is a data structure, not a permission preset. You can have a wiki with no visitor write rights. It would still be a great way to manage teams. It seems that Twiki shines in this respect; I’m less sure how good it is with pure blog features.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search Midas Oracle

Search Midas Oracle

Post Categories