<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Media Predict startup is smarter than the Inkling-Giberson conglomerate.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/12/04/the-media-predict-startup-is-smarter-than-the-inkling-giberson-conglomerate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/12/04/the-media-predict-startup-is-smarter-than-the-inkling-giberson-conglomerate/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Giberson</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/12/04/the-media-predict-startup-is-smarter-than-the-inkling-giberson-conglomerate/#comment-16537</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Giberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/12/04/the-media-predict-startup-is-smarter-than-the-inkling-giberson-conglomerate/#comment-16537</guid>
		<description>To avoid confusing the casual reader, I should probably point out that there is no &quot;Inkling-Giberson conglomerate&quot; (I&#039;m just an Inkling user and fan who happens also to be an economist and blogger).

Chris, you aren&#039;t clear why you think Inkling&#039;s &quot;Predict the date&quot; is a better design than my use of Inkling&#039;s multi-outcome structure.  You hint it has something to do with liquidity.  I need more hints.  I don&#039;t get it.

I do see that all the trading gets focused as buy or sell of a single contract rather than spread out across, in this particular example, nine contracts.  

But my approach allows traders to express both a point estimate and a spread (a trader can buy both &quot;two months&quot; and &quot;three months&quot; and &quot;four months&quot; if he feels that the strike will last more than one but less than five months, without a strong feeling about when during that middle three months things will end).

In the predict a date approach, if the current prediction is in the middle of the third month (our trader&#039;s average expected value), the trader can&#039;t trade.

I am merely asserting some advantages, but don&#039;t think anyone has researched the relative performance of the two designs (except maybe internally at Inkling.  Anyone at Inkling want to speak up?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To avoid confusing the casual reader, I should probably point out that there is no &#8220;Inkling-Giberson conglomerate&#8221; (I&#8217;m just an Inkling user and fan who happens also to be an economist and blogger).</p>
<p>Chris, you aren&#8217;t clear why you think Inkling&#8217;s &#8220;Predict the date&#8221; is a better design than my use of Inkling&#8217;s multi-outcome structure.  You hint it has something to do with liquidity.  I need more hints.  I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>I do see that all the trading gets focused as buy or sell of a single contract rather than spread out across, in this particular example, nine contracts.  </p>
<p>But my approach allows traders to express both a point estimate and a spread (a trader can buy both &#8220;two months&#8221; and &#8220;three months&#8221; and &#8220;four months&#8221; if he feels that the strike will last more than one but less than five months, without a strong feeling about when during that middle three months things will end).</p>
<p>In the predict a date approach, if the current prediction is in the middle of the third month (our trader&#8217;s average expected value), the trader can&#8217;t trade.</p>
<p>I am merely asserting some advantages, but don&#8217;t think anyone has researched the relative performance of the two designs (except maybe internally at Inkling.  Anyone at Inkling want to speak up?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

