<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Pat Buchanan&#8217;s socio-economic ramblings lead to the creation of socially interesting, long-term prediction markets?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/11/26/could-pat-buchanans-socio-economic-ramblings-lead-to-the-creation-of-socially-interesting-long-term-prediction-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/11/26/could-pat-buchanans-socio-economic-ramblings-lead-to-the-creation-of-socially-interesting-long-term-prediction-markets/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets + Market Predictions = Collective Forecasting That Pays Off</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:17:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Giberson</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/11/26/could-pat-buchanans-socio-economic-ramblings-lead-to-the-creation-of-socially-interesting-long-term-prediction-markets/#comment-16506</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Giberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/11/26/could-pat-buchanans-socio-economic-ramblings-lead-to-the-creation-of-socially-interesting-long-term-prediction-markets/#comment-16506</guid>
		<description>To be clear, when I refer to &quot;his nonsensical ramblings about &#039;loss of sovereignty&#039; and manufacturing jobs &#039;vanishing&#039; &quot;, I am speaking hypothetically (I.e. subsuming the &quot;nonsensical ramblings&quot; description under the &quot;Even if...&quot; clause at the beginning of that sentence.

I haven&#039;t read the book under discussion, and so am not (at this time) claiming Buchanan&#039;s latest book is in fact nonsensical rambling.

The point is that the offers implicit in a well defined prediction market provide the opportunity for pundits of all stripes to &quot;put their money where their mouth is&quot; and thereby provide a test of the strength of their commitment to their claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, when I refer to &#8220;his nonsensical ramblings about &#8216;loss of sovereignty&#8217; and manufacturing jobs &#8216;vanishing&#8217; &#8220;, I am speaking hypothetically (I.e. subsuming the &#8220;nonsensical ramblings&#8221; description under the &#8220;Even if&#8230;&#8221; clause at the beginning of that sentence.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read the book under discussion, and so am not (at this time) claiming Buchanan&#8217;s latest book is in fact nonsensical rambling.</p>
<p>The point is that the offers implicit in a well defined prediction market provide the opportunity for pundits of all stripes to &#8220;put their money where their mouth is&#8221; and thereby provide a test of the strength of their commitment to their claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
