<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aren’t most firms using binaries for their internal prediction markets?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/10/26/aren%e2%80%99t-most-firms-using-binaries-for-their-internal-prediction-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/10/26/aren%e2%80%99t-most-firms-using-binaries-for-their-internal-prediction-markets/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets + Market Predictions = Collective Forecasting That Pays Off</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:07:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Byrne Hobart</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/10/26/aren%e2%80%99t-most-firms-using-binaries-for-their-internal-prediction-markets/#comment-16409</link>
		<dc:creator>Byrne Hobart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/10/26/aren%e2%80%99t-most-firms-using-binaries-for-their-internal-prediction-markets/#comment-16409</guid>
		<description>Given low enough transaction costs, each contract is a proxy for other contracts: let&#039;s say we&#039;re betting on voter turnout, and we have contracts in 5% increments: turnout will be above 40%, 45%, 50%, etc. When estimated turnout increases from 43% to 44%, all of these contracts go up -- the only difference is the &#039;delta&#039; (change in derivative price compared to change in price of underlying indicator), so a clever quant would just write a short script saying, roughly, &quot;Find me the cheapest way to bet that turnout will be 47%, with a standard deviation of 3%,&quot; which should yield a melange of long and short positions in various contracts, to be rebalanced as prices (and thus deltas) change.

The Arrow-Debreu  framework is great, as long as computation is cheap (it is!) and transaction costs are minimal (we&#039;ll get there!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given low enough transaction costs, each contract is a proxy for other contracts: let&#8217;s say we&#8217;re betting on voter turnout, and we have contracts in 5% increments: turnout will be above 40%, 45%, 50%, etc. When estimated turnout increases from 43% to 44%, all of these contracts go up &#8212; the only difference is the &#8216;delta&#8217; (change in derivative price compared to change in price of underlying indicator), so a clever quant would just write a short script saying, roughly, &#8220;Find me the cheapest way to bet that turnout will be 47%, with a standard deviation of 3%,&#8221; which should yield a melange of long and short positions in various contracts, to be rebalanced as prices (and thus deltas) change.</p>
<p>The Arrow-Debreu  framework is great, as long as computation is cheap (it is!) and transaction costs are minimal (we&#8217;ll get there!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
