While when proposing new markets, “speculators” is often a pat answer when there are no obvious counter-hedgers, we know that hedge funds and others are looking for capacity, and there are many examples of possible legislative markets where there are natural counter-hedgers. In your example just replace “tax” with “subsidy” and suddenly every other tax-payer has an implied risk.
Now it is true that those dispersed interests won’t suddenly coalesce when such markets are introduced, but they will be in a better situation than they were before the market was in place. Also, a large trader may end-up with a position in alignment with taxpayers’ interests, which might lead to lobbying for the presumably more efficient outcome. I don’t really see these markets as ending lobbying. One of their drawbacks is that they may actually increase the demand for new legislation (as opposed to hedging against bills already in the pipe). I’m comfortable discussing these potential issues though — that’s the most productive thing that can happen at this stage.
Also Jerry, there are really no public contracts like we are discussing. Intrade’s social security private account contract of a couple years ago is the closest thing that comes to mind, and of course election contracts which serve the same general purpose though with vastly more basis risk.
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Native apps are reigning on mobiles, but Jakob Nielsen strategically bets on web apps. — [LINK]
- Steven Krivit continues to trash Andrea Rossi and his LENR technology. — [LINK]
- Interview with Adam Lashinsky — [VIDEO]
- Why some people are more innovative — [VIDEO]
- Forbes editor deciphers Steve Jobs’s Apple. — [VIDEO]
- Jason Ruspini rebuts Eric Zitzewitz on the regulation of political prediction markets. — [COMMENT]
- Eric Zitzewitz petitions the CFTC in favor of real-money prediction markets about politics. — [TEXT]
- Global warming is a big scam. — [LINK]
- A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors — [VIDEO]
- The Tragedy of the Commons — [VIDEO]
- Guy Kawasaki on Steve Jobs — [VIDEO]
- Inside Apple — [VIDEO]
- Mitt Romney’s taxes — [LINKS]
- A critique of Apple’s multimedia iBooks. — [LINK]
- Does Apple lack “generosity”? — [LINKS]
- Apple Education Push — [LINKS]
- Water Crystals — [DOCUMENT]
- Apple’s e-book software will allow publishers to make textbooks more interactive. — [LINKS + VIDEO]
- Alain Soral is France’s most dangerous intellectual… (dangerous for the French plutocrats, that is). — [VIDEO]
- Computers thru time — [CHART]