<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The limitations of logic (and the need for passion)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/05/10/the-limitations-of-logic-and-the-need-for-passion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/05/10/the-limitations-of-logic-and-the-need-for-passion/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/05/10/the-limitations-of-logic-and-the-need-for-passion/#comment-15589</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 23:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/2007/05/10/the-limitations-of-logic-and-the-need-for-passion/#comment-15589</guid>
		<description>There is also the idea however that the perfect should not be the enemy of the good, but it seems that you and Steve and Alex and Masse don&#039;t even think the statement was &quot;good&quot;.

This is just another iteration of the schism between principled libertarians and pragmatists (who may not care about sports) on the PM legality question.  As usual, it&#039;s likely that nothing will actually be *done* as a result of the statement.. and I again don&#039;t put too much weight on the exact text.  It&#039;s just a conversation-starter and honestly it&#039;s a complete throw-away given that the CFTC has already said they would not issue a no-action letter - with three of the signers present.

(As for the limitations of logic, my feeling is that &quot;the heart&quot; is in reality another kind of &quot;head&quot; with its own logic, the rationality of which may be less straightforward, but there.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also the idea however that the perfect should not be the enemy of the good, but it seems that you and Steve and Alex and Masse don&#8217;t even think the statement was &#8220;good&#8221;.</p>
<p>This is just another iteration of the schism between principled libertarians and pragmatists (who may not care about sports) on the PM legality question.  As usual, it&#8217;s likely that nothing will actually be *done* as a result of the statement.. and I again don&#8217;t put too much weight on the exact text.  It&#8217;s just a conversation-starter and honestly it&#8217;s a complete throw-away given that the CFTC has already said they would not issue a no-action letter &#8211; with three of the signers present.</p>
<p>(As for the limitations of logic, my feeling is that &#8220;the heart&#8221; is in reality another kind of &#8220;head&#8221; with its own logic, the rationality of which may be less straightforward, but there.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

