Are punters sophisticated?

Niall O'Connor April 3rd, 2007

No Gravatar

A leading Irish bookmaker (BetChronicle), with close associations to the Dublin-based, betting exchange, Betdaq, has put up a best price offer of 2.75 Tiger Woods to win the US masters (to 130 sterling), against an available price to lay on Betfair of 2.58.

A sure fire way of backing a winner, but is the price being arbitraged away by thousands of small online punters wishing to lock in a profit?

The evidence suggests not…. Reasons: Perhaps a combination of ignorance and inertia; or might it simply be that the amount of money to be won in performing the arbitrage is an irrelevant sum to the big players, whilst the majority of small punters do not have the funds necessary to perfom the arbitrage.

Either way, you can back Woods at 2.75 with BetChronicle and currently lay him on Betfair at 2.58.

— This story was brought to you by bettingmarket.com, which, apart from on 1 April, provides a concise and objective analysis of the changes impacting upon the global betting industry, applying knowledge and experience from the fields of marketing, economics and law.

One Response to “Are punters sophisticated?”

  1. Niall O'ConnorNo Gravataron 04 Apr 2007 at 11:21 AM

    At 17.19 GMT it is noted that the price differential has been arbitraged away, with Woods now trading at 2.76 on Betfair.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.