… is when he labels “prediction markets” some things that have nothing to do with them.
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Native apps are reigning on mobiles, but Jakob Nielsen strategically bets on web apps. — [LINK]
- Steven Krivit continues to trash Andrea Rossi and his LENR technology. — [LINK]
- Interview with Adam Lashinsky — [VIDEO]
- Why some people are more innovative — [VIDEO]
- Forbes editor deciphers Steve Jobs’s Apple. — [VIDEO]
- Jason Ruspini rebuts Eric Zitzewitz on the regulation of political prediction markets. — [COMMENT]
- Eric Zitzewitz petitions the CFTC in favor of real-money prediction markets about politics. — [TEXT]
- Global warming is a big scam. — [LINK]
- A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors — [VIDEO]
- The Tragedy of the Commons — [VIDEO]
- Guy Kawasaki on Steve Jobs — [VIDEO]
- Inside Apple — [VIDEO]
- Mitt Romney’s taxes — [LINKS]
- A critique of Apple’s multimedia iBooks. — [LINK]
- Does Apple lack “generosity”? — [LINKS]
- Apple Education Push — [LINKS]
- Water Crystals — [DOCUMENT]
- Apple’s e-book software will allow publishers to make textbooks more interactive. — [LINKS + VIDEO]
- Alain Soral is France’s most dangerous intellectual… (dangerous for the French plutocrats, that is). — [VIDEO]
- Computers thru time — [CHART]
Alex is spot-on in pointing out the dubious value of such forecasting games. While at some point one of these might produce a nice result in terms of aggregating opinion or identifying experts (especially the latter), for now play money games that try to duplicate or compete against established real money markets seem relatively uninteresting.
Don’t the S&P 500/Wilshire 5000 etc already approach the average opinion? Again, these games are more about selecting “crowds” of experts, which is difficult given their play-money risk-seeking limitations.
If one of these sites became established and reasonably good however, it would be interesting to compare its picks to banking analysts who are subject to the opposite risk bias of herding.
Got you. Thanks.