<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PEAR lab (Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research) - REDUX - Retrocausality in physics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midasoracle.org/2006/11/18/pear-lab-princeton-engineering-anomalies-research-redux-retrocausality-in-physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2006/11/18/pear-lab-princeton-engineering-anomalies-research-redux-retrocausality-in-physics/</link>
	<description>Prediction Markets For All</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.midasoracle.org/2006/11/18/pear-lab-princeton-engineering-anomalies-research-redux-retrocausality-in-physics/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midasoracle.org/2006/11/18/pear-lab-princeton-engineering-anomalies-research-redux-retrocausality-in-physics/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>My hunch is simply that there is no temporality to entanglement whatsoever - that's being confused with apparent superluminal signalling.

Firstly no-one has yet demonstrated that entanglement can convey any information, only that instantaneously correlated measurements can be made at a distance.

Secondly, an apparent ability for conference to occur faster than light doesn't consequently demonstrate anything is actually travelling at that speed.

Thirdly, instantaneous signalling, even if it was possible (and jolly useful for space exploration), might upset some theory, but it doesn't mean that we can change history or see into the future.

Fourthly, one could imagine entangled particles as if they were a single entity visible in separate locations, i.e. no material separation, simply the physical illusion of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My hunch is simply that there is no temporality to entanglement whatsoever - that&#8217;s being confused with apparent superluminal signalling.</p>
<p>Firstly no-one has yet demonstrated that entanglement can convey any information, only that instantaneously correlated measurements can be made at a distance.</p>
<p>Secondly, an apparent ability for conference to occur faster than light doesn&#8217;t consequently demonstrate anything is actually travelling at that speed.</p>
<p>Thirdly, instantaneous signalling, even if it was possible (and jolly useful for space exploration), might upset some theory, but it doesn&#8217;t mean that we can change history or see into the future.</p>
<p>Fourthly, one could imagine entangled particles as if they were a single entity visible in separate locations, i.e. no material separation, simply the physical illusion of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
